Right to ride: African American citizenship and protest in the era of Plessy v. Ferguson.(Jim Crow)
Publication Date: 22-JUN-07
Publication Title: African American Review
Format: Online
Author: Kelly, Blair L.M.

Read this article now
Try Goliath Business News - FREE!

You can view this article PLUS...

  • Over 5 million business articles
  • Hundreds of the most trusted magazines, newswires, and journals (see list)
  • Premium business information that is timely and relevant
  • Unlimited Access

Now for a Limited Time, try Goliath Business News
Free for 7 Days!

Tell Me More   Terms and Conditions

Purchase this article for $4.95

Description

Jim Crow was a traveling intruder, a black interloper in all-white spaces. Originally, Jim Crow was a folk character featured in the rhyming games of slave children. (1) As the black-faced minstrel character played by the white performer Thomas "Daddy" Rice, Jim Crow was an uncouth, uncultured, humorously dangerous runaway slave, insistent on barging in on the white world. Jim Crow was an insistent traveler; in Rice's performances, he could frequently be found riding in otherwise elegant trains, streetcars, and steamboats. (2) White audiences made Rices minstrel performances enormously popular in the 1830s, marking the consciousness of the United States with the image of the black intruder. The racial segregation of public conveyances was designed to prevent the kind of transgression of the social order that the character Jim Crow frequently committed in minstrel performances. The name Jim Crow became synonymous with the inferior, racially segregated train cars designated for black passengers, first in the antebellum North and later in the post-war South. The Jim Crow car was the place to shunt black passengers; a place where the "uncivilized negro" of white imaginations could be prevented from mingling with whites. As one judge argued, racial segregation helped "prevent contacts and collisions" that came from "a promiscuous sitting" (Railroad v. Miles, qtd. in Bowie v. Birmingham 1019).

The career of Paul Laurence Dunbar emerged from the shadow of Jim Crow. Critics like William Dean Howells cited Dunbar as the new voice of black artistic authenticity, the pre-eminent black literary figure of his day. Like the character Jim Crow, Dunbar reminded white Americans of the legacy of slavery; reviewers commented that the "dusky singer" was the "son of slaves" ("Negro Poet"). Some even questioned whether his use of dialect and slave tales was a form of minstrelsy. However, Dunbar hoped his audiences would "differentiate dialect as a philological branch from the burlesque of negro minstrelsy" (Letter to Helen Douglass). Early in his career, Dunbar saw the use of dialect as a preservation of black language, not a joke at black people's expense. For Dunbar, dialect could also be a site of subversion and trickery central to African American resistance and survival. (3) The author served as a counterpoint to antebellum minstrelsy, through the nuance of his writing and the dignity of his recitations.

Writing in opposition to the images created by Rice's portrayal of Jim Crow, Dunbar presented the eloquent expression of a generation wedged between the promises of freedom and the disappointments of segregation. His literary works often appealed to stereotypes and then complicated them, empathizing with images of the slave past while insisting on full citizenship in the present. Dunbar even offered an explanation for the "grins and lies" of the minstrel Jim Crow in one of his most famous poems, "We Wear the Mask"; such masked performances hid anger, disappointment, and dissent (1.1).

While Dunbar could challenge the limitations of Jim Crow in literature, Jim Crow segregation and the boundaries of race confronted Dunbar repeatedly during his travels. Central to his success as a poet was his recitation of his work throughout the nation. A December 1895 article chronicling the life of the young poet reported that Dunbar had "gained considerable reputation as an elocutionist and lecturer" and had "spoken throughout Kentucky, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Illinois, and Wisconsin, and in some of the larger cities of Canada" ("Writes"). Dunbar traveled abroad to England in 1897, and continued to travel throughout the nation for recitals between 1898 and 1902. Speaking tours not only popularized Dunbar's work, but also helped him make a living. Honoraria, ticket sales, and the sale of his books during these tours supported his art and the needs of his family. (4) Dunbar delighted audiences both black and white, but was forced to confront the demeaning practices of Jim Crow. His fame and success came as black citizenship crumbled under the weight of disfranchisement, lynching, and the federal endorsement of segregation.

How did Dunbar, dependent on travel for his livelihood, negotiate the difficulties of segregation? What strategies did Dunbar have to employ to maintain his dignity while riding with the specter of Jim Crow? Using the fragments of evidence available in his correspondence, published essays, short stories, and poetry, this paper traces Dunbar's experience with travel. While it is impossible to ascertain exactly how often Dunbar was subjected to the "Jim Crow" car, this essay gauges his response to the growing presence of segregation during his brief career. In what ways did he seek to avoid the insults of racial segregation, and how did he protest such conditions? Given the frequent comments about his appearance as "the pure negro type," did his dark skin color subject him to worse treatment than that his lighter skinned peers suffered? (5) How did the difficulties of the road over time erode Dunbar's health? How did travel abroad contrast with the treatment he received in America? I trace his daily struggle to be one of the "best men" of the race in the face of the worst social conditions, to complicate our understandings of Dunbar's life, art, and politics.

For African Americans, difficulties on trains were almost universal. Jim Crow cars were an anathema to black travelers; from their inception, black leaders, dependent on train travel for their livelihoods, fought exclusion and the inferior conditions on trains and streetcars. Dunbar did not detail any particular awful journey in a Jim Crow car in his correspondence, but he did hint at his relief when he was not subjected to the Jim Crow car. Dunbar traveled in an age of increasing restrictions on black travelers; state by state, southern legislatures demanded the segregation of black passengers...



More articles from African American Review
Factoring out race: the cultural context of Paul Laurence Dunbar., June 22, 2007
Paul Laurence Dunbar and the project of cultural reconstruction., June 22, 2007
Paul Laurence Dunbar and Turn-into-the-20th-Century African American D..., June 22, 2007
"I know why the caged bird sings!": Dunbar in China.(Paul Laurence Dun..., June 22, 2007
Dunbar lives!(Paul Laurence Dunbar), June 22, 2007

Looking for additional articles?
Click here to search our database of over 3 million articles.