Dietary supplement quality assurance--something's missing!
Publication Date: 01-SEP-07
Publication Title: Original Internist
Format: Online
Author: Liva, Rick

Read this article now
Try Goliath Business News - FREE!

You can view this article PLUS...

  • Over 5 million business articles
  • Hundreds of the most trusted magazines, newswires, and journals (see list)
  • Premium business information that is timely and relevant
  • Unlimited Access

Now for a Limited Time, try Goliath Business News
Free for 7 Days!

Tell Me More   Terms and Conditions

Purchase this article for $4.95

Description

As I write this article for the Original Internist on dietary supplement quality assurance, I am excited to educate clinicians about such an important, complicated, and clinically relevant subject. I will do my best to educate healthcare practitioners about the quality assurance and quality control procedures necessary to make the purest, highest quality, and most effective nutritional supplements and natural medicines. While I realize that "efficacy" is not a direct result of a high quality product, I can say with certainty that clinical outcome can be influenced by a poor quality product.

My goal in this article is to sound the alarm and draw attention to the many quality assurance holes in the supply chain and manufacturing arena for dietary supplements and natural products. This is not a situation of "crying wolf," but rather a serious discussion about significant quality assurance problems with these products that can, and probably do, adversely affect our friends, families, and patients. The overall intent of providing this information is to give a detailed presentation of solutions to these quality assurance issues, so that we can collectively increase the integrity of the supply chain. While the solutions I present won't necessarily be easy or inexpensive to institute, they are possible, feasible, and must be considered.

We clinicians don't really know if we have purchased and prescribed a high quality natural product, and we should. I believe this to be critically important for two reasons: clinical effectiveness and contamination. If a product is sub-potent, super-potent, or not authentic, it can definitely influence the desired short- or long-term clinical outcome. In addition, a contaminated product may, over time, cause possible harm to the patient that will probably go unrecognized, and most likely won't be linked back to the contaminated product. In my experience, this industry as a whole does not provide consistent quality. I have seen far too many examples of subpotency, lack of authenticity, contamination, and a general lack of quality assurance all across the supply chain that feeds...



Looking for additional articles?
Click here to search our database of over 3 million articles.