|
Description
ConciseXML is a new syntax I co-developed with Christopher Fry that builds on the best features of XML and S-Expressions while eliminating their constraints.
XML originated with the document-markup world of SGML and has become the leading syntax of the Internet. Its use been for documents and data--not for programming logic.
S-Expressions, or symbolic expressions, is the syntax behind Lisp-like languages, including Scheme. Basically, S-Expressions are nested lists of symbols. S-Expressions are used with languages that support the notion that code is data.
The many discussion postings on the Web regarding these topics would indicate a disconnect between the S-Expression and XML camps. The purpose of this article is to bridge the two worlds and offer a solution that addresses everyone's needs.
To illustrate the differences among the three syntaxes, let's start with a data structure expressed in XML S-Expressions, ConciseXML, and also a commonly used semicolon-delimited syntax used by many programming languages, including Java. While there are multiple ways of encoding the data in XML and S-Expressions, only one is shown for the purposes of the first comparison.
* XML
* S-Expressions
(book "0764525360" "Water Language" 2002)
* ConciseXML
* Semicolon-Delimited Syntax
new Book ("0764525360", "Water Language", 2002);
There are a number of similarities among the first three syntaxes:
* The expressions are delimited by characters that indicate the start and end of the expression. S-Expressions are delimited by a set of parentheses "( )", while XML and ConciseXML expressions use angle brackets " ".
* The expression name occurs immediately after the initial delimiter.
* White space is used to separate arguments.
* The syntax is independent of a specific language.
The semicolon-delimited syntax is different from the others in several ways. A comma is used between arguments, and there is no set of delimiter characters that always begin or end an expression. Parsing a semicolon-delimited syntax requires that the parser have language-specific knowledge. The first three syntaxes can be easily parsed, independent of any language.
Now let's look at some of the differences among the four... |
More articles from XML Journal
Remember ebXML? Doing business in real time.(Standards), February 01, 2004
Web-services transactions: from Loosely Coupled--the Missing Pieces of..., February 01, 2004
FileAct for SWIFTNet: helping financial services gain savings from the..., February 01, 2004
Rendering a connected tree using XSLT: the ideas behind XSLT and XPath..., February 01, 2004
Looking for additional articles?
Click here
to search our database of over 3 million articles.
|
%20%20&position=1)