Christopher Rovee. Imagining the Gallery: The Social Body of British Romanticism.(Book review)
Publication Date: 22-MAR-07
Publication Title: Studies in Romanticism
Format: Online
Author: Paley, Morton D.

Read this article now
Try Goliath Business News - FREE!

You can view this article PLUS...

  • Over 5 million business articles
  • Hundreds of the most trusted magazines, newswires, and journals (see list)
  • Premium business information that is timely and relevant
  • Unlimited Access

Now for a Limited Time, try Goliath Business News
Free for 7 Days!

Tell Me More   Terms and Conditions

Purchase this article for $4.95

Description

Christopher Rovee. Imagining the Gallery: The Social Body of British Romanticism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006. Pp. xii+251. $55.00.

Imagine the faces of the Presidents of the United States in chronological order, or, if you will, those of British monarchs going back to George I. In doing this, you have created, in Christopher Rovee's use of the term, a gallery. As few of us have seen more than one or two presidents, kings, or queens, almost all of our images will necessarily be taken from photographs, paintings, engravings, and other representations. We are free to keep our galleries mental, or, if moved by patriotic, artistic, or entrepreneurial zeal, to turn them into external realities, whether online, in a bricks-and mortar space, or on the printed page. Our galleries would not of course be "objective" renditions; an integral part of the gallery is the spin put on its images. A future scholar examining our galleries might draw various conclusions about our society, as Christopher Rovee does about British visual culture in Imagining the Gallery.

Rovee wisely does not attempt a history of galleries from 1768 through 1832, but instead focuses on five aspects of his subject in chapters framed by a substantial introduction and a short epilogue. In the later eighteenth century, as he observes, the highest artistic mode was considered to be history painting but the number of portraits exhibited at the Royal Academy exceeded the history paintings by far. The reason is not hard to find: portraits were almost always painted on commission while no one but the very rich could afford to buy or find the space to hang most history painting, with the occasional exception of institutions. (Reward could be slow in the case of the latter: William Blake asserted that while executing The Progressive of Human Culture at the Adelphi for the Society of Arts, James Barry lived on bread and apples.) As portraiture had become the dominant mode in practice, something had to be done to elevate its status in order to force market...



More articles from Studies in Romanticism
James O'Rourke. Sex, Lies, and Autobiography: The Ethics of Confession..., March 22, 2007
Tom Lockwood. Ben Jonson in the Romantic Age.(Book review), March 22, 2007
Books received., March 22, 2007

Looking for additional articles?
Click here to search our database of over 3 million articles.