Home | Business News | Browse by Publication | M | Mondaq Business Briefing

Failure Of Creditor Class To Cast Vote On Chapter 11 Plan Does Not Equate To Acceptance.

Publication: Mondaq Business Briefing
Publication Date: 18-AUG-08
Format: Online
Delivery: Immediate Online Access
Full Article Title: Failure Of Creditor Class To Cast Vote On Chapter 11 Plan Does Not Equate To Acceptance.(Vita Corporation )

Article Excerpt
The solicitation of creditor votes on a plan is a crucial part of the chapter 11 process. At a minimum, a chapter 11 plan can be confirmed only if at least one class of impaired creditors (or interest holders) votes to accept the plan. A plan proponent's efforts to solicit an adequate number of plan acceptances, however, may be complicated if creditors or other enfranchised stakeholders neglect (or choose not) to vote. The Bankruptcy Code does not provide a mechanism to force creditors to vote, nor does it clearly spell out the consequences of not voting where none of the creditors or interest holders in a given class have voted to accept or reject a chapter 11 plan. The lack of any clear guidance on this important issue has spawned a rift in the courts. In In re Vita Corp., an Illinois district court recently addressed the ramifications of a creditor class's failure to vote in its entirety, ruling that classes in which all impaired creditors fail to cast ballots either accepting or rejecting a plan are not deemed to have accepted the plan for purposes of confirmation.

Chapter 11 Voting and Confirmation Rules Chapter 11 plan confirmation is governed by Bankruptcy Code section 1129, which provides for both consensual and nonconsensual confirmation. The rules governing consensual confirmation, which are set forth in section 1129(a), include the requirement that "with respect to each class of claims or interests (A) such class...

View this article FREE - Now for a Limited Time, try Goliath Business News
Free for 3 Days!



More articles from Mondaq Business Briefing
New Anti-Monopoly Law Of The PRC., August 21, 2008
A Second Bite Of The Cherry?(Taylor Walton v Laing)(Aldi Stores Ltd v ..., August 21, 2008
The Polkey Case.(Polkey v A.E. Dayton Services Ltd), August 21, 2008
The Wasted Costs Jurisdiction: A Review., August 21, 2008
Data Protection And Consumer Information Rights., August 21, 2008

Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.

Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication name or publication date.

About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company analysis or best practices in managing your organization, Goliath can help you meet your business needs.

Our extensive business information databases empower business professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible, authoritative information they need to support their business goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting, company research or defining management best practices - Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.