|
Article Excerpt
A physician owes a duty of reasonable care, under ordinary negligence principles, to everyone foreseeably put at risk by the doctor's failure to warn a patient of the potential side effects of treatment, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has held.
Noting that courts in other states have imposed this duty in similar circumstances, the court reversed summary judgment and remanded for trial a case involving a doctor whose 75-year-old patient, not warned that his medications could impair his driving ability, lost consciousness behind the wheel of his car and fatally injured a child. (Coombes v. Florio, 877 N.E.2d 567 (Mass. 2007).)
The court said the duty arises "when the side effects in question include drowsiness, dizziness, fainting, or other effects that could diminish a patient's mental capacity."
"In the case of automobile...
|
|
More articles from Trial
Free drug samples fail as a safety net for poor patients, study says., March 01, 2008
Arizona high court upholds several-only liability in products cases., March 01, 2008
Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.
Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication
name or publication date.
About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company
analysis or best practices in managing your organization,
Goliath can help you meet your business needs.
Our extensive business information databases empower business
professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible,
authoritative information they need to support their business
goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting,
company research or defining management best practices -
Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.
|
|
