Home | Business News | Browse by Publication | J | Journal of Mental Health Counseling

Forgiveness and forgetting: clinical implications for mental health counselors.

Publication: Journal of Mental Health Counseling
Publication Date: 01-JAN-08
Format: Online
Delivery: Immediate Online Access
Full Article Title: Forgiveness and forgetting: clinical implications for mental health counselors.(PRACTICE)

Article Excerpt
Although mental health professionals have attempted to specify the meaning of forgiveness, lack of consensus exists. Despite the lack of consensus over the meaning of forgiveness, there is agreement that forgiving is not forgetting or pardoning. However, the relationship between forgiving and forgetting has been undertheorized, and as a result, this relationship has not been empirically investigated In this paper, we suggest that it would be fruitful to assess the meaning systems individuals associate with the definition of forgiveness. Focusing on the lived experience of individuals may help researchers and counselors avoid unhelpful dichotomizations such as "authentic vs. inauthentic" forgiveness. Implications for both research and mental health counseling are discussed.



In the case of the smallest or of the greatest happiness ... it is always the same thing that makes happiness happiness: the ability to forget or, expressed in more scholarly fashion, the capacity to feel unhistorically during its duration. (Nietzsche, 1876/1997, p. 62)

INTRODUCTION

Within the past three decades, social scientists and practitioners have become increasingly interested in forgiveness and its potential for improving personal well-being and interpersonal relationships (Enright & Fitgibbons, 2000; McCullough, Pargament, & Thoresen, 2000; Wade, Bailey, & Shaffer, 2005; Wade & Worthington, 2005). The increase in interest is in part driven by data suggesting that forgiveness can be a helpful counseling tool with a wide range of populations, including substance abusers, cancer patients, and couples addressing moderate to severe relationship and communication issues (Flanigan, 1987; Freedman & Enright, 1996; Gordon, 1999; Phillips & Osborne, 1989; Reed & Enright, 2006). In fact, willingness to forgive and be forgiven was identified as one of the 10 most important characteristics of long-term relationships (Fenell, 1993). Mental health counselors overwhelmingly support the use of forgiveness interventions, because there is consensus that forgiveness is associated with the individual releasing him or herself from anger, resentment, and fear and not wishing to seek revenge (Denton & Martin, 1998; Konstam, et al. 2000). Most individuals writing in this area also believe that forgiveness is interpersonal and intra-psychic, and that it is a choice (Tangney, Fee, Reinsmith, Boone, & Lee, 1999).

Despite this consensus, ambiguity and disagreement exist with respect to a myriad of definitional issues related to forgiveness. Specifically, there exists a lack of clarity in the literature regarding what forgiveness is and what processes facilitate or impede the ability to forgive. For example, authors disagree on the relationship between forgiveness and reconciliation, whether forgiveness is a necessary component of personal growth (Hargrave & Sells, 1997), and whether one has to feel love and compassion toward the offender in order to forgive (Davenport, 1991; Denton & Martin, 1998). Furthermore, Sandage, Hill and Vang (2003) assert that forgiveness may be expressed or defined differently in various cultural contexts and communities. How forgiveness is theorized and defined is critically important when developing psychological interventions to facilitate forgiveness. Both researchers and mental health professionals need to be sensitive to differences in lived experiences and in meaning systems associated with forgiveness.

Definitional Issues Related to Forgiveness

Forgiveness is a multidimensional construct, informed by a wide range of disciplines, including anthropology, psychology, philosophy, political science, theology, and sociology (McCullough, Pargament, & Thoreson, 2000). Although the perceived gravity of a transgression must be taken into account, forgiveness has traditionally been viewed as a virtue or strength of character (Sandage et al., 2003; Wade & Worthington, 2003). According to Tangney et al. (1999), an individual's ability to forgive is dependent on contextual variables related to the specific incident. Researchers who have studied intra-individual factors related to forgiveness suggest that the ability to forgive is dependent in part, on cognitive and affective characteristics. For example, shame, guilt, and empathy have been identified as emotions that may inform forgiveness (Konstam, Chernoff, & Deveney, 2001; Tangney, Fee, Reinsmith, Boone, & Lee, 1999; see also, Enright and the Human Development Study Group, 1991; McCullough, Fincham, & Tsang, 2003). However, it should be noted that in some contexts forgiveness may not be the most salient issue in moving on and may actually perpetuate relations of inequality. Lamb (2002; 2006) for example, raises important issues regarding the relationship between justice and forgiveness, articulating her concerns vis-a-vis trauma victims. Discussing the problems with clinical interventions designed to facilitate forgiveness in victims of abuse, she noted, "[F]orgiveness therapy is a victim therapy that makes no claims to helping stop victimization" (Lamb, 2005, p.75).

A variety of definitions of forgiveness have emerged in the literature with most definitions focusing on forgiveness as a process, whereby an individual moves from a position of resentment to one of diminishment of anger toward the perceived wrongdoer. McCullough, Bellah, Kilpatrick and Johnson (2001) maintained that forgiveness is a "prosocial" transformation in motivations toward the offender, such that the individual is less vengeful and avoidant and concomitantly more benevolent. For Wade, Worthington, and Meyer (2005) "true" and "appropriate" forgiveness includes the ability to view the transgressor realistically and inclusively acknowledging the good and bad. That is, having positive feelings such as compassion or empathy is believed to be critical to forgiveness. Also, because an interpersonal transgression can be experienced as a narcissistic injury, Wade, Worthington and Meyer point out that the ability to forgive requires a fairly strong sense of self and ego strength.

Others (e.g., Enright et al., 1991) have defined forgiveness as a willingness to abandon one's right to resentment, negative judgment, and indifferent behavior. These authors suggest that forgiveness also includes fostering undeserved compassion, generosity, and perhaps love toward the...

Read the FULL article now - Try Goliath Business News - FREE!   
You can view this article PLUS...

  • Over 5 million business articles
  • Hundreds of the most trusted magazines, newswires, and journals (see list)
  • Premium business information that is timely and relevant
  • Unlimited Access

Now for a Limited Time, try Goliath Business News - Free for 3 Days!
Tell Me More   Terms and Conditions

Get Goliath Business News for 1 year - Just $99 (Save 65%)
Tell Me More   Terms and Conditions

Already a subscriber? Log in to view full article



More articles from Journal of Mental Health Counseling
Mental health professionals' evaluations of the integral intake, a met..., January 01, 2008
Looking back at adolescent depression: a qualitative study.(Survey), January 01, 2008
Using to numb the pain: substance use and abuse among lesbian, gay, an..., January 01, 2008

Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.

Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication name or publication date.

About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company analysis or best practices in managing your organization, Goliath can help you meet your business needs.

Our extensive business information databases empower business professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible, authoritative information they need to support their business goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting, company research or defining management best practices - Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.