Home | Business News | Browse by Publication | H | History Review

Who was guilty of starting the Boer War? Michael Willis focuses on the origins of the Boer War in a way that could make for a stimulating role-play.

Publication: History Review
Publication Date: 01-DEC-07
Format: Online
Delivery: Immediate Online Access
Full Article Title: Who was guilty of starting the Boer War? Michael Willis focuses on the origins of the Boer War in a way that could make for a stimulating role-play.(The Unpredictable Past)(Case study)

Article Excerpt
British people fought, followed and supported the second Boer War of 1899-1902 with infectious enthusiasm. Historians have their doubts about how deep-rooted this enthusiasm was in the working class, but when British troops relieved a small force besieged at Mafeking in May 1900 hundreds of thousands went on to the streets intoxicated by military success. War news excited a record million people to buy the patriotic, imperialist Daily Mail. The war was the main issue in the 1900 general election won overwhelmingly by the Conservative government which seemed to have won the war.

All this produced a bad hangover. Quick victories on the battlefield were followed by an 18-month guerrilla war when the British invented the concentration camp.

The Elgin Commission's report in 1903 exposed all kinds of military inefficiencies in running the war, and there was some short-term disillusionment with imperialism. Later the British government introduced extensive self-government for the Boers when they created the new Union of South Africa in 1910. The war soon looked like a big mistake. Why had it been fought and who was guilty of starting it?

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

British and Boers

The Boers were descended from a Dutch community which had been in South Africa from the 17th century. After Britain took over the Cape area in 1815 the Boers tried to escape British rule by moving inland, founding the Transvaal and Orange Free State. They struggled to maintain their independence from the British in the mid 19th century, and the outcome from the 1880s was that the two Boer states ran their own affairs, while the British had some power to supervise their relations with other countries and uncertain rights to intervene in their government. Relations were strained, and they got worse when British...

View this article FREE - Now for a Limited Time, try Goliath Business News
Free for 3 Days!



More articles from History Review
The Mid-Tudors, Edward and Mary, 1547-1558.(Book review), December 01, 2007
French appeasement: Andrew Boxer considers explanations for France's d..., December 01, 2007
Mussolini's Fascism: St Hugh's College, Oxford, in association with Hi..., December 01, 2007
Franco and the Spanish Civil War: Julius Ruiz evaluates Franco's role ..., December 01, 2007
Note-taking: purpose, problems and proposals: drawing on classroom exp..., December 01, 2007

Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.

Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication name or publication date.

About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company analysis or best practices in managing your organization, Goliath can help you meet your business needs.

Our extensive business information databases empower business professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible, authoritative information they need to support their business goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting, company research or defining management best practices - Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.