Home | Business News | Browse by Publication | T | The Cato Journal

Inflation targeting for the United States?

Publication: The Cato Journal
Publication Date: 22-MAR-07
Format: Online
Delivery: Immediate Online Access

Article Excerpt
Is inflation targeting suitable for the United States? I am inclined to say "Yes," but there are some issues and qualifications that need to be discussed. First, what is inflation targeting? Second, are there political problems that are likely to arise? Third, what about the arguments suggesting that inflation targeting has not provided benefits to those nations that have adopted it? Fourth, what about the analytical components of models typically used to analyze inflation targeting? These topics will be taken up in the sections that follow.

What Is Inflation Targeting?

When the term "inflation targeting" first began to be used frequently, around 1990, it was understood to mean a monetary policy strategy that made the achievement of a designated low rate of inflation the sole objective of monetary policy. Low inflation had, after all, been one of the main stated objectives of the Federal Reserve (the Fed) and other central banks for a long time (although it was not an explicit objective under the gold standard and the date at which maintenance of the gold standard ended is certainly open to dispute (1)). The concept of inflation targeting (henceforth, IT) gained prominence, I believe, from the policy regimes adopted by the Bank of Canada and the Reserve Bank of New Zealand--especially the latter, because of its spectacular provision concerning possible discharge of the governor if inflation was not contained each year within a target range of to 2 percent. A major objective of these developments in Canada and New Zealand was, as I understood it, to get away from the then-standard view that monetary policy needed to strike an appropriate balance between goals pertaining to inflation and real output (or employment) stabilization. Thus early writings on IT emphasized the idea that, from a long-run perspective, central banks could have virtually no influence on output while being almost totally responsible for the behavior of inflation. (2) In order to put this idea into practice, it was deemed desirable to stress the primacy of inflation control to the point that a formal representation of a central bank objective function would, logically, include inflation (measured relative to target) as its only argument. During the later 1990s, however, this concept was replaced in academic--and probably central-bank--work with one that included both inflation and aggregate output (or employment) goals in the central bank's objective function. Writings by Svensson (1997, 1999) were particularly influential in this respect.

What, then, was the justification for a terminology in which policy regimes of this type would be called inflation targeting? The evolution in terminology went, I believe, something like the following. In the early 1990s, both the United Kingdom and Sweden were forced by market and political pressures to give up their fixed exchange rate regimes. They needed some nominal anchor, and wished to avoid any suggestion of "monetary targeting" as the latter would seem too much like a "monetarist" policy, which had been discredited in the eyes of the public and was never embraced by central banks other than the Swiss National Bank and (to some extent) the Bundesbank. Also, they wished to give more weight to inflation prevention than had been the case earlier in the 1980s and believed that the New Zealand-Canada idea of an explicit numerical inflation target was promising. So, the Bank of England and the Sveriges Riksbank chose "inflation targeting" as the label for their new (and not yet fully developed) monetary policy regimes. Writers on the subject who wanted to promote policies that stressed inflation control combined with output stabilization and more explicitness (or "transparency") therefore adopted the IT label. And since these writers were more numerous than ones who favored a sole operational objective--believing that this approach would result in excellent output/employment performance--they were able to capture the IT designation and to use it...

View this article FREE - Now for a Limited Time, try Goliath Business News
Free for 3 Days!



More articles from The Cato Journal
The case for inflation targeting., March 22, 2007
What type of inflation target?, March 22, 2007
What Democracy Is For: On Freedom and Moral Government.(Critical essay..., March 22, 2007
Consumed: How Markets Corrupt Children, Infantilize Adults, and Swallo..., March 22, 2007

Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.

Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication name or publication date.

About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company analysis or best practices in managing your organization, Goliath can help you meet your business needs.

Our extensive business information databases empower business professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible, authoritative information they need to support their business goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting, company research or defining management best practices - Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.