Home | Industry Information | Business News | Browse by Publication | S | Social Justice

Urban renewal and the end of social housing: the roll out of neoliberalism in East Berlin's Prenzlauer Berg: urban renewal, urban policy, and modes of regulation.

Publication: Social Justice
Publication Date: 22-SEP-06
Format: Online
Delivery: Immediate Online Access

Article Excerpt
HISTORICALLY, URBAN RENEWAL HAS BEEN AN INSTRUMENT AND EXPRESSION OF SOCIAL and political tendencies and power relations. The slum-clearing measures by Baron Georges-Eugene Haussmann in 19th-century Paris aimed at order and urban sanitation for the fast-growing cities in the age of In the the...

View more below

Read this article now - Try Goliath Business News - FREE!   
You can view this article PLUS...

  • Over 5 million business articles
  • Hundreds of the most trusted magazines, newswires, and journals (see list)
  • Premium business information that is timely and relevant
  • Unlimited Access

Now for a Limited Time, try Goliath Business News - Free for 7 Days!
Tell Me More   Terms and Conditions

Purchase this article for $4.95

Already a subscriber? Log in to view full article

...industrialization. 1960s, urban renewal strategies involving complete demolition of old buildings and their replacement with new ones exemplify the ideology of functional cities in the age of Fordism. Re-urbanization strategies in the current phase of urban policy are boosting a post-Fordist orientation toward sophisticated lifestyles and conspicuous consumption. Both the results and the procedures of urban renewal mirror the social and political circumstances. Haussmann's rigid clearing-up stood for an authoritarian state and rode roughshod over poor people's needs. The renewal projects of Fordism were expressions of welfare-oriented top-down planning. In this article, I argue that the current phase of urban renewal represents a passage into a neoliberal strategy that renounces the prior orientation toward welfare. There is stronger involvement of private investors and interests in urban development and it is characterized by a new kind of urban governance.

The renewal of the Berlin district known as Prenzlauer Berg--the largest renewal area in East Berlin--exemplifies this neoliberal turn of urban policy. All of the typical characteristics of urban renewal in the 1990s are visible here. Without the ballast of former policies, the political elite in Berlin was able to introduce and implement new strategies of urban renewal in Prenzlauer Berg after the reunification of Germany. East Berlin became a laboratory for the transformation from socialism to capitalism, as well as for new urban policies.

Today, the nearly 60,000 units in Prenzlauer Berg represent the biggest associated neighborhood in "Wilhelminian style," with a housing stock built before 1914. It is considered an inner-city neighborhood. The working- and under-classes, plus employees in lower positions, traditionally dominated its social structure. During the German Democratic Republic (GDR), the housing stock deteriorated because a political decision was taken to withdraw all investment from the area. East German housing policy was highly centralized and most capacities focused on the construction of new, prefabricated, and large residential buildings. At the same time, the quality of the buildings deteriorated rapidly. By 1990, l0 to 20% of all housing units were empty, creating a housing situation that was worse than after World War II. Eighty percent of all flats lacked modern heating, with 100-year-old coal ovens typical. This lack of modernity generated an all-pervasive smell. During the winter months, a heavy grey smog settled over the streets of Prenzlauer Berg. Only 50% of the housing units had bathrooms and a toilet, with 25% of all inhabitants sharing a toilet with tenants from other flats. Especially in the rear buildings, two or three flats shared a toilet located on the staircase. Given the physical condition of its housing, Prenzlauer Berg was a perfect backdrop for urban renewal.

East Berlin in the 1990s: The End of "Careful Urban Renewal"

Urban renewal debates in Berlin at the beginning of the 1990s represented the ideals of careful urban renewal. A counter-project to the autocratic area rehabilitation policy of the 1960s and 1970s (demolition and new development) (Schulz zur Wiesch, 2001), the reform of urban renewal started with the International Building Exhibition of 1984 and referred to three types of carefulness: (1) physical care, or the careful handling of historic buildings, an avoidance of demolition, and an orientation toward gradual renewal procedures; (2) social care, or a considerate handling of old tenants with the specific goal of not endangering the existing social structure in the renewal area and to prevent displacement; and (3) planning policy care, or care given to expanding the capacity of inhabitants to participate, and to avoid implementing any measure against their will (Hetzer, 2000; Bernt, 2003).

Already in the 1980s, the model of careful urban renewal was criticized as the first example of post-Fordist urban redevelopment in Germany (Homuth, 1984). In particular, it was stated that planning processes were decentralized, that participation procedures were less political, and that there was a physical orientation toward authenticity and uniqueness. Yet post-Fordism in the processes was shaped by, and integrated into, social-democratic policy: careful urban redevelopment was financed entirely by public budgets, sought to supply housing for "wide circles of the population," and emphasized the active participation of residents.

After 1990, this careful urban renewal model was transferred to East Berlin, with the same constellation of governmental and nongovernmental actors maintained for the most part (Bernt, 2003). As within other spheres of society, the transformation of urban policy could not to be accomplished with a simple "copy and paste" instruction. In Berlin, involvement of all of the actors meant that the transmission of structures and experiences did not necessarily lead to the same processes and results. The conditions for urban renewal policy in East Berlin were hardly comparable to the experiences of West Berlin.

Two transformation processes after 1990 affected the framework for renewal in Prenzlauer Berg: that from socialism to capitalism and the German variation on incorporating an Eastern society into a Western political system. Commodification of Prenzlauer Berg housing was brought about through the re-adoption of market principles for real estate and housing and the privatization of (former municipal or state-owned) properties. After German reunification, the structure of property in East Germany was fundamentally transformed. Expropriated housing was supposed to be returned to the previous landlords or their heirs.

Restitution to the previous owners led to a rapid reorganization of the ownership structures in the redevelopment zones. Most of them were neither personally nor technically able to realize renewal activities and quickly resold the recently returned properties (Dieser, 1996). The purchasers were usually professional real estate companies, urban development companies, and estate brokers. Thus, privatization of the housing stock prevailed (Reimann, 2000), and the structure of ownership in East Berlin became increasingly professional (Holm, 2001).

Unification of the...

NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.



More articles from Social Justice
Housing for the working class on the periphery of Mexico City: a new v..., September 22, 2006
Public or private? The Pope squat and housing struggles in Toronto., September 22, 2006
The dialectics of privatization and advocacy in New York City's workfa..., September 22, 2006
The pace of neoliberal globalization: a comparison of three popular mo..., September 22, 2006

Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.

Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication name or publication date.

About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company analysis or best practices in managing your organization, Goliath can help you meet your business needs.

Our extensive business information databases empower business professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible, authoritative information they need to support their business goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting, company research or defining management best practices - Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.