|
Article Excerpt Abstract
This study sought to explore students' attitudes toward four types of interaction in the online learning environment: instructional, affective, collaborative, and vicarious interactions. The results indicated that students had significant differences in their attitudes toward the four types of interaction. Learners' attitudes were related to their course satisfaction, and their attitudes significantly predicted course satisfaction. The findings of this study offered some explanation of college students' attitudes toward online interaction, and should help educators better understand how to make online learning more satisfying to the students.
Introduction
While efforts have been made in the field of online learning to facilitate activities that can support higher levels of learning, the main concerns about online learning research have centered on aspects of designing effective online learning environments. Studies have shown that interaction in the online learning environment may lead to positive educational outcomes, greater retention rates (Bocchi, Eastman & Swift, 2004; Lenning & Ebbers, 1999), and increased effectiveness of distance education (Flottemesch, 2000; Kearsley, 2000; McLoughlin & Luca, 2003). Interaction is an essential element in the learning environment (Northrup, 2002) and a quality indicator in any online course (Cohen & Ellis, 2003). If the learning environment is focused on interaction, it follows that it would most likely be a learner-centered approach (Bruner, 1966) that encourages interaction between learners (Bragg, 1999).
Theoretical Framework of the Study
In spite of the widely held belief that interaction can influence the quality of online learning (Roblyer & Ekhaml, 2000), there has been relatively little empirical research investigating how online learners would view the different types of interaction. Jung, Choi, Lim, and Leem (2002) researched the students' preferences with respect to interaction, and they found that different types of interaction varied in terms of the effects on learner achievement, satisfaction, and participation in interaction. Their results demonstrated that the social interaction group outperformed the other groups (including collaborative and academic groups), and the collaborative interaction group expressed the highest level of satisfaction with their learning process. The collaborative and social interaction groups were more active in posting their opinions to the discussion board than was the academic interaction group. Given the importance of interaction in instruction, we proceeded to investigate the basic elements of interaction with regard to its function in the learning process. Four types of interaction were examined in this study: instructional, affective, collaborative, and vicarious interactions.
Instructional interaction is content-centered and tends to overlap with learner-content interaction. It is a basic type of interaction; it always occurs when the learner reads online materials, gets task-oriented feedback from the instructor or from more competent peers, or participates...
|
|

More articles from Academic Exchange Quarterly
Course development issues in online education., December 22, 2006 Teaching U.S. politics in comparative perspective., December 22, 2006 Simulation and learning theories., December 22, 2006 Gender differences in students' social goals., December 22, 2006 Middle school homework management and attitudes., December 22, 2006
Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.
Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication
name or publication date.
About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company
analysis or best practices in managing your organization,
Goliath can help you meet your business needs.
Our extensive business information databases empower business
professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible,
authoritative information they need to support their business
goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting,
company research or defining management best practices -
Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.
|
|