Home | Business News | Browse by Publication | A | Arena Magazine

Who is accountable to whom? Attempts to graft the governance structures of for-profit organisations onto universities threaten the very form of the university.

Publication: Arena Magazine
Publication Date: 01-JUN-05
Format: Online
Delivery: Immediate Online Access
Full Article Title: Who is accountable to whom? Attempts to graft the governance structures of for-profit organisations onto universities threaten the very form of the university.(Against the Current)

Article Excerpt
Building University Diversity, the issues paper recently released by Dr Brendan Nelson, canvasses the opening up of the higher education sector to a range of for-profit providers, both national and international. The concern that shareholders in their single-minded pursuit of profits might impede academic freedom and jettison research and critical inquiry is well-founded.

I nevertheless feel that the exclusive focus on for-profit institutions deflects attention away from the increasingly problematic question of governance in not-for-profit universities, that is, our present so-called public universities. I say 'so-called' because they have all moved into privatising and profit-making activities on such a scale that the very term 'public' has become questionable. Indeed, Professor Di Yerbury, President of the Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee, recently referred to them as 'nominally public institutions' [my italics] (Higher Education, the Australian, 9 March 2005). Her suggestive descriptor is supported by the statistics, which reveal that Commonwealth support now accounts for only about 40 per cent of university income, a spectacular decrease since the federal government embarked on its project of transforming higher education fifteen years ago.

The regulatory regime being devised for the new for-profit institutions will enable at least a modicum of scrutiny, whereas the marketising moves of existing not-for-profit institutions has induced less scrutiny under the rubric of 'commercial-in-confidence'. The ethic of the market and competition is causing them to become more like for-profit universities, or what we imagine them to be, since we have little experience of them; to date, Melbourne University Private is our only example. (Both Bond and Notre Dame are characterised as not-for-profit...

View this article FREE - Now for a Limited Time, try Goliath Business News
Free for 3 Days!



More articles from Arena Magazine
Reply to Philip Mendes 3.(Letter to the editor), June 01, 2005
Indigenous internationalism: new adventures in indigenous governance.(..., June 01, 2005
New Britain, new comedy.(bites: BRIEF NOTES ON NEWS AND VIEWS FROM ARO..., June 01, 2005
Signs from the Vatican: Margaret Coffey finds reasons for optimism in ..., June 01, 2005

Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.

Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication name or publication date.

About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company analysis or best practices in managing your organization, Goliath can help you meet your business needs.

Our extensive business information databases empower business professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible, authoritative information they need to support their business goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting, company research or defining management best practices - Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.