|
Article Excerpt Abstract
This study investigated: 1) the strategies used by EFL university students as they attempted to master new English words and 2) if strategy activation would affect students' vocabulary learning. Two groups of university students were asked to monitor and report on a weekly basis the strategies they used to learn new words. Students in Group Two had the chance to discuss and elaborate on the strategies in the class while students in Group One did not. Both groups were then tested on a multiple choice vocabulary test and two delayed vocabulary tasks of recall and recognition. Group Two students showed a systematically better performance on the vocabulary test and tasks.
Introduction
As teachers of second or foreign languages, we have noticed that students have difficulty with learning words in their second language. It is, however, the case that students use strategies and techniques of their own to learn the words in a better way. One of the reasons for the ever increasing interest in studying language learning strategies has been the fact that learners are valued and prized in the educational programs as active participants who bring their own personal behaviors to the scene and shape the way in which they learn. Through studying learners' strategies we get familiar with their strategic knowledge being defined by Lefrancois (1991) as a sort of knowledge about how to do things, solve problems, learn and memorize, understand and perhaps, more importantly to monitor, evaluate, and direct the mentioned activities as they occur. Thus, conducting research on learning strategies seems promising with both theoretical and practical implications.
Background to the study
Since the late 1970s, a considerable amount of research has been carried out concerning vocabulary learning strategies utilized by language learners (for a detailed review of empirical studies on vocabulary learning strategies in second/foreign languages refer to Gu, 2003). In these studies, emphasis has been mainly on three types of strategies, namely, keyword (Pressly, Levin and Delaney, 1982), context (Nist and Olejnik, 1995; Hulstijn et al., 1996), and semantic processing (Beck, Mckeown and Omanson, 1987). The keyword method, which has received a good deal of experimental study, involves using interactive imagery to link the sound of a word in one's native language (the keyword) to the sound of a foreign word that has to be learnt (Levin, 1981; Pressly, Levin and Delaney, 1982; Pressly et al., 1980). Several studies have reported the positive effect of keyword method on students' vocabulary learning (Atkinson and Rough, 1975; Beaton et al., 1995).
Advocates of context believe that vocabulary is best learned when it is met in some sort of context (Honeyfield, 1977 cited in Nunan, 1991; Sternberg, 1987 cited in Nist and Olejnik, 1995). Besides the target...
|
|

More articles from Academic Exchange Quarterly
Action research on student portfolios., June 22, 2004 Academics and professional military education., June 22, 2004 Christian Hercules--a new research method., June 22, 2004 Moral values for public education., June 22, 2004 Building math confidence for a high-tech world., June 22, 2004
Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.
Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication
name or publication date.
About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company
analysis or best practices in managing your organization,
Goliath can help you meet your business needs.
Our extensive business information databases empower business
professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible,
authoritative information they need to support their business
goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting,
company research or defining management best practices -
Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.
|
|