...say them all, (3) and it is the amount of data that can be stored on only two to three commercially available hard disk drives, or on a single network server.

Electronic discovery is now a fact of life for companies, litigators and courts. The proliferation of computer usage, inexpensive data storage, and developments in communication technology have changed modern discovery practice tremendously over the past several years. Courts around the country have been promulgating ad hoc case law, rules, and procedures to deal with electronic discovery. (4) The United States Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure voiced concern about the effect this patchwork of rules will have on companies and individual litigants:

Developing case law on discovery into electronically stored information under the current rules is not consistent and is necessarily limited to the specific facts involved. Disparate local rules have emerged to fill this gap between the existing discovery rules and practice, and more courts are considering local rules. Without national rules adequate to address the issues raised by electronic discovery, a patchwork of rules and requirements is likely to develop. While such inconsistencies are particularly confusing and debilitating to large public and private organizations, the uncertainty, expense, delays, and burdens of such discovery also affect small organizations and even individual litigants. (5)

To address the gap between the current Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and modern discovery practice, the Judicial Conference proposed amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16, 26, 33, 34, 37, 45, and Form 35. The United States Supreme Court approved the amendments and, absent unexpected congressional intervention, the changes will take effect on December 1, 2006. (6) Although the amendments are still a few months away, courts have already started looking to the proposed rules for guidance. (7)

Perhaps the most significant change effected by the new amendments will be the imposition of obligations on the parties to address issues relating to the discovery of electronic information very early in litigation. Meeting those obligations and the other requirements set forth in the new amendments will call for some new and creative approaches to discovery. Staying ahead of the terabytes of information that are accumulating in companies' computer systems and managing that information for discovery will require a great deal cooperation and communication between companies and their counsel. Indeed, there is already a growing expectation by the judiciary that counsel will be familiar with their client's electronic information systems.

Brief Summary of the Amendments

The proposed rules do not dramatically change e-discovery practices that have developed over the years in many jurisdictions. The proposed rules will specifically empower courts to adopt the parties' agreements regarding e-discovery into pretrial case management and scheduling orders. The new rules will allow a requesting party to test or sample electronically stored information and specify the format in which it wants electronic information produced. The rules also establish a two-tiered process for production whereby easily obtained information can be produced first, and less accessible data can be produced later, if necessary. The new rules envision a safe harbor from sanctions for the loss of electronically stored information, provided the loss is occasioned by the good-faith, routine operation of computer equipment. Finally, the rules introduce formal procedures regarding the inadvertent production of privileged or protected documents or electronic information. Many of the proposed amendments simply conform the rules to practices that have developed by courts and practitioners over the past several years.

New Terminology

The proposed rules recognize that electronic information can not always be neatly categorized under the current terminology: "documents" and "data compilations." For instance, relational databases are not simply documents, and they are more than just data compilations. Similarly, multimedia files such as video...

NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.



More articles from Defense Counsel Journal
Defending the transactional legal malpractice case: trends and conside..., October 01, 2006
The scope and use of the attorney-client privilege in the U.S. and its..., October 01, 2006
Dying declarations in an ever-changing world: a peek into the implicat..., October 01, 2006
Insurance law - Frank's Casing's effect on reimbursement of settlement..., October 01, 2006
Verbal abuse: Supreme Court slaps down discriminatory standard., October 01, 2006

Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.

Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication name or publication date.

About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company analysis or best practices in managing your organization, Goliath can help you meet your business needs.

Our extensive business information databases empower business professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible, authoritative information they need to support their business goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting, company research or defining management best practices - Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.