Home | Industry Information | Business News | Browse by Publication | P | Policy Studies Journal

Efficient nonprofits?

Publication: Policy Studies Journal
Publication Date: 01-AUG-06
Format: Online
Delivery: Immediate Online Access

Article Excerpt
Introduction

There are several reasons why we might expect nonprofits to appear "inefficient." First, many nonprofits create public goods and services--arts, education, social services--which people want, but have limited incentive to pay for voluntarily with donations, and hence the of &...

View more below

Read this article now - Try Goliath Business News - FREE!   
You can view this article PLUS...

  • Over 5 million business articles
  • Hundreds of the most trusted magazines, newswires, and journals (see list)
  • Premium business information that is timely and relevant
  • Unlimited Access

Now for a Limited Time, try Goliath Business News - Free for 7 Days!
Tell Me More   Terms and Conditions

Purchase this article for $4.95

Already a subscriber? Log in to view full article

...ratio costs to revenues can appear unfavorable. Second, nonprofits cannot distribute profits to firm owners under American tax law, which eliminates stakeholders with the most obvious stake in organizational efficiency. Finally, as many authors have noted, metrics for nonprofit efficiency are notoriously porous and imprecise, making it difficult to enforce organizational accountability (Keating Frumkin, 2003).

Under traditional accounting measures, nonprofits in the United States might appear quite inefficient. For example, consider the data on the simple return on investment (ROI) for total spending by nonprofits in various subsectors from 2001. This measure, which is fairly standard to judge for-profit business practices, is calculated as revenues (TR) less expenditures (TC), as a percentage of net firm assets (A). That is,

ROI - TR - TC/A (1)

Table 1 summarizes this calculation for the nonprofits in the United States in 2001 that filed an IRS Form 990, and which recorded positive expenditures. (1) These data show that nonprofit subsectors tend to see an ROI that is under three percent--and potentially even negative.

Compared to the ROI generated by for-profits, the figures in Table 1 are very low. Desai (2001) shows that the ROI enjoyed by American multinational forprofits tends to be about 17 percent, on average. For example, over the period 1982 to 1995, the annual ROI was 19 percent for chemical firms, 21 percent for food companies, 18 percent for machinery producers, and 23 percent for transport firms.

This discrepancy between for-profits and nonprofits might lead to the intuitive conclusion for many people that nonprofits are somehow "inefficient": If they would just tighten up their operations, make smarter spending decisions, and be held more accountable to stakeholders, the reasoning goes, then they would achieve higher ROI levels, indicating a more "businesslike" stewardship of funds. Indeed, even some nonprofit insiders seem to share this view. For example, OpenConsult, a nonprofit e-commerce consulting firm, pitches its services with this statement: "Facing market pressure to become more efficient and less dependent on the government, nonprofit organizations today must find new ways to achieve a leaner, more businesslike operation." (2)

Given this viewpoint, it is especially striking to find a number of scholars on the nonprofit sector who appear to assert that, on the contrary, nonprofits do not need to become more businesslike. Light (2001), for example, writes that

[j]ust because the nonprofit sector needs to improve its performance does not necessarily mean it has to become more businesslike. Unfortunately, absent a compelling vision of what being nonprofit-like means, it is hard to imagine that individual organizations will be able to resist the pressure to become less like nonprofits.

Similarly, Frumkin (2004) states that

[while] nonprofit and voluntary organizations appear weak, inefficient, and directionless,... nothing could be further from the truth. In reality, [nonprofits have] a set of unique advantages that position them to perform important societal functions neither government nor the market is able to match.

Are nonprofits inefficient, or are they not? Clearly, there is substantial ambiguity in the way we measure efficiency, the way we understand it intuitively for nonprofits, or both. Two major trends in public administration and nonprofit management make this fact a significant...

NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.



More articles from Policy Studies Journal
Potential focusing projects and policy change., August 01, 2006
Breathless: schools, air toxics, and environmental justice in Californ..., August 01, 2006
Punctuated equilibria and budgets in the American states., August 01, 2006
Policy coherence and policy domains., August 01, 2006
Punctuated equilibrium in limbo: the tobacco lobby and U.S. State poli..., August 01, 2006

Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.

Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication name or publication date.

About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company analysis or best practices in managing your organization, Goliath can help you meet your business needs.

Our extensive business information databases empower business professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible, authoritative information they need to support their business goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting, company research or defining management best practices - Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.