Home | Industry Information | Business News | Browse by Publication | B | British Journal of Psychology

Planning abilities and chess: A comparison of chess and non-chess players on the Tower of London task.

Publication: British Journal of Psychology
Publication Date: 01-AUG-06
Format: Online
Delivery: Immediate Online Access

Article Excerpt
Studies on chess have a long history in cognitive psychology (e.g. Binet, 1894; Djakow, Petrowski, & Rudik, 1927). Chess allows the assessment of expertise in a knowledge-rich domain (Chase & Simon, 1973; de Groot & Gobet, 1996; Waters, Gobet, & Leyden, 2002) and offers the possibility to & &...

View more below

You can view this article PLUS...

  • Hundreds of the most trusted magazines, newspapers, newswires, and journals (see list)
  • Business news from North America and around the World
  • More than 10 years of article archives
  • Unlimited Access at any time - ONLINE and all in ONE place

Now for a Limited Time, try Goliath Business News - Free for 7 Days!
Tell Me More   Terms and Conditions
Already a subscriber?
Log in to view full article
Purchase this article for $4.95

...study higher order cognition (Newell Simon, 1972; van der Maas Wagenmakers, 2004).

From an individual approach, the focus of cognitive research on chess abilities has mainly been on intelligence and memory capacities. Some authors have stressed that intelligence is associated with chess skills in children (Frydman & Lynn, 1992; Horgan & Morgan, 1990) and male adults (Doll & Mayr, 1987), whereas others found no differences between chess players and non-chess players in general intelligence (Djakow et al, 1927). Concerning memory, a lot of research has been conducted on the recall of chess positions (e.g. Chase & Simon, 1973; Ericsson & Kintsch, 1995; Ericsson, Patel, & Kintsch, 2000; Gobet, 1998, 2000), as well as on visuospatial memory assessed with non-chess specific psychometric instruments (Schneider, Gruber, Gold, & Opwis, 1993; Waters et al., 2002). The pattern-recognition account of chess expertise (e.g. Chase & Simon, 1973) suggests that experts have stored more and larger 'chunks' of meaningful gameboard configurations than do weaker players. As a consequence of recognizing these patterns, they can make relatively good decisions, even under time pressure. This account has strongly influenced research on expertise and decision making in other domains such as fire fighting, medical diagnosis and aviation (e.g. Zsambok & Klein, 1997).

On the other hand, the importance of planning in chess has been highlighted (Gobet, 1997; Holding & Reynolds, 1982; Holding, 1985, 1989; Saariluoma & Hohlfield, 1994). In contrast to the pattern-recognition account of Chase and Simon (1973), Holding (1985) emphasized that the central activity of chess consists of choosing moves, which is an active process of looking (search) for the best (evaluation) moves. The search process is viewed as including elements of planning, since the player must find a path through the search tree that leads to the designated position. Holding and Reynolds (1982) showed that when experts are asked to make a move on a random board game, they make better choices than non-experts. This result indicates that at least some components of chess expertise must be based on search and planning rather simply reflecting retrieval of stored move sequences in response to a recognized pattern.

To the best of our knowledge, no studies have been conducted to explore the relationship between chess skills and planning abilities as measured by means of psychometrics. According to van der Maas and Wagenmakers (2004), chess is commonly classified into three basic skills: tactical ability, positional insight or judgment and endgame knowledge. Tactical ability should be closely related to some aspects of planning and problem solving, since it is defined as the discovery and accurate calculation of 'combinations'. Tactical ability thus requires the calculation of concrete sequences of moves and countermoves. The generation of move sequences resembles the concept of planning which underlies common neuropsychological diagnostic instruments like the Tower of Hanoi or the Tower of London (ToL; Shallice, 1982). The ToL was introduced by Tim Shallice (1982) to study planning deficits in frontal lobe patients. Carlin et al. (2000) describe the cognitive processes involved in the ToL task as (1) a look-ahead mechanism designed to generate multiple sequences of hypothetical events and their consequences, (2) the development of stored structured event complexes that can guide movement from an initial to a goal state, (3) execution-linked anticipation of future events and (4) recognition of goal attainment. Note that 'planning' in the chess literature has a slightly different meaning: It is defined as 'strategic thinking' or long-range planning' (Saariluoma & Hohlfeld, 1994).

In the present study we compared planning abilities as measured by the ToL test between chess players (ranging from advanced beginners to very experienced chess players) and participants with no experience in playing chess. We also assessed fluid intelligence as well as verbal and visuospatial working memory, which may help to explain possible planning differences between both groups.

Methods

Participants...

NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.



More articles from British Journal of Psychology
Of two minds: sceptic-proponent collaboration within parapsychology., August 01, 2006
Belief in psychic ability and the misattribution hypothesis: a qualita..., August 01, 2006
Modulation of distraction in ageing., August 01, 2006
Does hunger influence judgments of female physical attractiveness?, August 01, 2006

Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.

Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication name or publication date.

About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company analysis or best practices in managing your organization, Goliath can help you meet your business needs.

Our extensive business information databases empower business professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible, authoritative information they need to support their business goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting, company research or defining management best practices - Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.