Home | Industry Information | Business News | Browse by Publication | J | Journal of Comparative International Management

Impact of governance, legal system and economic freedom on foreign investment in the MENA region.(Middle East and North Africa)

Publication: Journal of Comparative International Management
Publication Date: 01-JUN-05
Format: Online
Delivery: Immediate Online Access

Article Excerpt
While there is substantial literature examining the flow of foreign investments into various regions of the world, there is still lack of research focus on foreign investment activities in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). One objective of this paper is to remeely this neglect and work...

View more below

Read this article now - Try Goliath Business News - FREE!   
You can view this article PLUS...

  • Over 5 million business articles
  • Hundreds of the most trusted magazines, newswires, and journals (see list)
  • Premium business information that is timely and relevant
  • Unlimited Access

Now for a Limited Time, try Goliath Business News - Free for 7 Days!
Tell Me More   Terms and Conditions

Purchase this article for $4.95

Already a subscriber? Log in to view full article

...extend previous empirical by focusing on foreign investments in that region. The second objective is to focus on non-traditional determinants that have tended to be overlooked or underestimated in previous research. The paper will focus on factors such as governance, legal environment, and economic freedom and examine their impact on foreign investment activities in the MENA region.

Introduction

The objective of this paper is to focus on two significant research questions that have not yet been thoroughly examined in the literature on foreign investment. Over the last 15 years, the flow of foreign investment around the world has been growing spectacularly. While international trade has doubled, the flow of foreign direct investment (FDI) has increased by a factor of 10 (Levy-Yeyati et. al, 2003). Within the various regional growth of foreign investment, FDI flowing to developing countries has accounted for about 40 per cent of global FDI (Erdal & Tatoglu, 2002). Although there is substantial literature examining the flow of foreign investments into various regions of the world, unfortunately the majority of this research has focused on U.S. foreign investment activities in Europe, NAFTA Signatory nations, Asia and Pacific Rim nations, and economies in transition (Kingsley & Crumbley, 1997). There is a paucity of information and studies relating to joint ventures and foreign investment activities in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. The first objective of this paper is to remedy this neglect and extend previous empirical work by focusing on foreign investment in the MENA region.

When looking at foreign investment data within the MENA region, one can't help but notice the wide variability in the flow of foreign investment and joint venture activities, and wonder why some countries are more attractive to foreign investments than others. In trying to determine some of the factors that impact foreign investment flow, it is important to distinguish between three categories of foreign investment, these are: 1) market seeking; 2) resource seeking; and 3) efficiency seeking investments (Dunning, 1993). A 1998 UNCTAD report argued that globalization has led to a reconfiguration of the ways in which multinationals pursue these various types of foreign investments, and changed the motives for and the determinants of FDI (Dunning, 1999). For example, in recent years, foreign investment in developing countries has shifted from market and resource seeking investments, to more efficiency seeking investments (Dunning, 2002). This has prompted some to argue that the relative importance of some of the traditional market related factors (relative wage costs, infrastructure, macroeconomic policy) no longer hold (Loree and Guisinger 1995) and to suggest that less traditional determinants have become more important (Noorbakhsh, Paloni and Youssef 2001; Addison and Heshmati, 2003; Becchetti and Hasan, 2004). Furthermore, given that in recent years, the region is witnessing a new era in privatization, bank regulation and market-oriented financial institutions (Omran, 2004), the need to examine the role of alternative determinants is even more relevant.

The majority of the countries in that region are neither big enough to attract a significant number of market seeking foreign investment, nor resource rich enough to attract resource seeking foreign investment. Therefore, in analyzing foreign investment in the MENA region the second objective of this paper is to focus on some of the non-traditional factors that have tended to be overlooked or underestimated in previous research on foreign investment. In light of this focus, the paper will thus consider factors such as governance, legal environment, and economic freedom and examine their impact on foreign investment in the MENA region.

Hypotheses

Foreign Investment and the MENA Region

Foreign investment has numerous effects on the economy of the recipient country. It influences the labor market, income, prices, export and import (Erdal and Tatoglu. 2002). It is an important vehicle for the transfer of technology and a positive contributor to economic growth (Lim, 2001). Unfortunately however, the recent unprecedented growth in foreign investment activities has largely bypasses the Arab world (UNCTAD, 1999). Compared with other developing countries, the capital inflow in the Arab world has remained constant at about $10 billion in the last 2 decades, whereas it has increased four times to reach $300 billion in other developing countries, mainly in East Asia, Latin America and increasingly in Central Europe. Recent analysis revealed that the Arab world received on average 1% of global FDI in the 1990s compared to 2% of their share in world GDP. Most of these FDIs were concentrated in six Arab countries, namely Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Oman, Saudi Arabia and Tunisia and were mostly undertaken in the oil, petrochemical, and manufacturing industries, especially textiles, metals and minerals (Sadik and Bolbol, 2001).

Comparing inward FDI performance with potential for the same region produces a matrix representing front runners, below potential, above potential and under performers respectively:

High FDI Performance Low FDI performance High FDI potential Front Runners: Bahrain, Below Potential: Egypt, Jordan, Israel Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE Low FDI potential Above Potential: Under-Performers: Algeria, Morocco, Sudan Iran, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, Yemen Source UNCTAD: Inward FDI performance and potential 1999-2001.

Further examination of some of the countries in this matrix reveals some interesting information. For example, although it is the largest economy in Eastern Europe, the European Union's sixth biggest trading partner, and the world's 7th largest emerging economy, Turkey is an under-performer. FDI flow into Turkey is only a fraction of the level of FDI attracted to countries of comparable size and development like Argentina and Mexico, and only one-quarter of the level of FDI attracted into Poland (Loewendahl, and Ertugal-Loewendahl, 2000). On the other hand, a significantly smaller country, Bahrain has managed to be a front runner. The country has been able to attract foreign investment through significant incentives such as labor subsidies, electricity and land rental rebates, 100% rebate on customs duties for major equipment/raw materials, export credit facilities and tariff protection. Many investors cited the country's tax structure as their key motivation to invest. Bahrain imposes virtually no personal tax, no restriction on capital or profit repatriation and most significantly no corporate taxation. (Gilmore, et al. 2003).

It is important to note that the recent shift from markets and resources seeking investments, toward more of an efficiency seeking investment could--if properly exploited--be advantageous to the MENA countries due to their relatively small market sizes and limited natural resources. The main objective of market-seeking investment is to meet demand in the domestic market. In resource-seeking investment, the objective is to make use of the host country resources to produce goods for sale outside the local market (Asiedu, 2002). Demands and resources however, are less relevant in efficiency seeking investment, where the emphasis is more on the efficiency with which foreign investors can operate, network, sell and export their products to other countries. Therefore, in striving to attract foreign investment, the most viable among the alternatives for the MENA region, would be a focus on efficiency seeking investors. Such notion reinforces the importance of examining efficiency enhancing elements such as governance, the legal system and economic freedom and their impact on foreign investment.

Governance

Globerman and Shapiro (2002)...

NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.



More articles from Journal of Comparative International Management
Economic liberalization, entrepreneurial development and manufacturing..., June 01, 2005
Competitiveness through increased added value: a challenge for develop..., June 01, 2005

Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.

Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication name or publication date.

About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company analysis or best practices in managing your organization, Goliath can help you meet your business needs.

Our extensive business information databases empower business professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible, authoritative information they need to support their business goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting, company research or defining management best practices - Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.