|
Article Excerpt We appreciate Professor Lampe's (2004) many thoughtful comments on our paper. We largely agree with him. Like Lampe, we see the MBTI as one useful psychometric instrument among many available and acceptable instruments. In our article, we primarily examine the MBTI in isolation, and do not compare it to other psychometric instruments. We did not intend to imply that other instruments are without value by using this approach. Instruments such as the Millon Inventory of Personality Styles (MIPS), the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), the California Psychological Inventory (CPI), and the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI) are useful for various types of AIS research. (1) Nevertheless, we think that the MBTI has three comparative strengths: (1) researchers have extensively tested the validity and reliability of the MBTI over approximately four decades; (2) the MBTI is grounded within a comprehensive psychology of personality; and (3) the MBTI is well suited for research examining the relationship of cognition and information processing to personality.
In regard to the first strength, which was dealt with in detail in the paper, we express disagreement with Lampe's comments about the test/retest reliability of the MBTI. Most reports of the MBTI's test/retest reliability have shown these correlations to be relatively high. For example, in Myers et al. (1998), the low-to-high test/retest range is 84 percent to 96 percent agreement of the bipolarities over a four-week period for Form M. Regarding Form G, the form Girelli and Stake (1993) reported, the range is 75 percent to 87 percent (Myers et al. 1998). The Girelli and Stake (1993) paper, cited by Lampe for its low MBTI test/retest scores, has met with methodological criticisms (Murray 1996); specifically, the researchers substituted the MBTI's forced-choice format with a Likert-scale format and then analyzed the...
|
|

More articles from Journal of Information Systems
Development of the Journal of Information Systems from the editors' pe..., March 22, 2004 The evaluation of risky information technology investment decisions., March 22, 2004 Selecting an audit software package for classroom use., March 22, 2004 Accounting for the development costs of internal-use software., March 22, 2004
Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.
Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication
name or publication date.
About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company
analysis or best practices in managing your organization,
Goliath can help you meet your business needs.
Our extensive business information databases empower business
professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible,
authoritative information they need to support their business
goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting,
company research or defining management best practices -
Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.
|
|