|
...and technology law. This year's annual Bibliography contains nearly 1000 articles, found through the examination over 1000 periodicals.
The Bibliography aims to include topics on every legal aspect of computers and technology. However, as new issues in this field emerge, we welcome your suggestions for additional topics and sources, as well as your commentary on the Bibliography.
INDEX
COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN LAW PRACTICE
1.0 General
1.1 Computerized Legal Research
1.1.0 General
1.1.1 Online Legal Research
1.1.2 Legal Research Using CD-ROM
1.2 Law Office Management
1.2.0 General
1.2.1 Office Automation
1.2.2 Case Management
1.2.3 Case File Security
1.2.4 Internet Access
1.3 Selected Uses in the Law Practice
1.3.0 General
1.3.1 Tax Filing
1.3.2 Bankruptcy
1.3.3 Estate Planning
1.3.4 Real Estate
2. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN LITIGATION
2.0 General
2.1 Scientific Evidence
2.1.0 General
2.1.1 Expert Testimony
2.1.2 DNA Typing
2.1.3 Fingerprint
2.1.4 Polygraph
2.1.5 Forensic Evidence
2.2 Demonstrative Evidence
2.2.0 General
2.2.1 Computer-Generated Evidence
2.2.2 Audio/Visual Evidence
2.3 Courtroom
2.4 Dispute Resolution
3. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN THE GOVERNMENT
3.0 General
3.1 Computers and Technology in Law Enforcement
3.1.0 General
3.1.1 Computers and Technology in Police Operation
3.1.2 Computers and Technology in Correctional Institutions
3.2 Use of Computers and Technology by Federal Departments and Agencies
3.2.0 General
3.2.1 Military Technology
3.2.2 Internal Revenue Service
3.2.3 U.S. Patent Office
3.2.4 Government Information Retrieval System
3.3 Use of Computers and Technology in Judicial Administration
3.4 Use of Computers and Technology by State and Federal Legislatures
4. LEGAL ISSUES OF COMPUTER AND TECHNOLOGY SALES, USAGE, AND SERVICES
4.0 General
4.1 Contracting for Hardware, Software, and Computer Services
4.1.0 General
4.1.1 Purchase, Lease and License Considerations
4.1.2 Limitations of Limited Warranties
4.2 Government Regulation of Computer-Related Industry
4.2.0 General
4.2.1 First Amendment Issues
4.2.2 Antitrust
4.2.3 FCC Regulation
4.2.4 SEC Regulation
4.2.5 Tariff and Trade Control
4.3 Substantive Law Aspects
4.3.0 General
4.3.1 Computer Crime
4.3.2 Computer-Related Product Liability
4.3.3 Computer Security
4.3.4 Taxation of Software
4.4 Problems of Privacy and Computers
4.4.0 General
4.4.1 Data Privacy
4.4.2 Governmental Invasion of Privacy
4.4.3 Credit Reference
5. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION
5.0 General
5.1 Legal Education
6. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN BUSINESS
6.0 General
6.1 Electronic Commerce
6.2 Computers in Banking and Finance
6.2.0 General
6.2.1 On-line Securities Trading
6.3 Computers and Technology in the Transportation Industry
6.4 Computers and Technology in the Publishing Industry
6.5 Computers and Technology in Advertising
7. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION OF COMPUTER AND TECHNOLOGY
7.0 General
7.1 Patent
7.1.0 General
7.1.1 Software Patent
7.1.2 Biotech Patent
7.2 Software Copyright
7.2.0 General
7.2.1 User Interface
7.2.2 Fair Use
7.2.3 Video Game
7.3 Digital Copyright
7.3.0 General
7.3.1 Electronic Compilation
7.3.2 Computer Database
7.3.3 Multimedia
7.3.4 Computer-Generated Works
7.4 Trademark
7.5 Trade Secret
7.6 Semiconductor Chip Protection
7.7 Licensing
7.8 Intellectual Property Issues of the Internet
7.9 International Developments
7.9.0 General
7.9.1 GATT-TRIPS
7.9.2 NAFTA
7.9.3 Developments in Canada
7.9.4 Developments in Mexico and Latin America
7.9.5 Developments in Australia and New Zealand
7.9.6 Developments in Africa
7.9.7 Developments in Asia
7.9.8 Developments in Western Europe
7.9.9 Developments in Eastern Europe and Russia
7.9.10 Developments in the European Union
8. COMPUTERS AND LEGAL REASONING
8.0 General
8.1 Artificial Intelligence
9. LEGAL ISSUES OF THE INTERNET
9.0 General
9.1 ISP and Internet Access
9.2 Domain Names
9.3 Taxation of Electronic Commerce
9.4 Encryption and Digital Signatures
9.5 Internet Crime
9.6 Civil Procedure in Cyberspace
10. LAW AND TECHNOLOGY
10.0 General
10.1 Technology Transfer
10.2 Audio/Video Recording
10.3 Space Law
10.4 Medical Technology
10.5 Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals
10.6 Environmental Law
10.6.0 General
10.6.1 Pollution
10.6.2 Hazardous Substances
10.6.3 Electromagnetic Fields
10.6.4 Nuclear Technology
10.6.5 Energy and the Environment
10.6.6 International Environmental Law Developments
10.7 Television
10.7.0 General
10.7.1 Satellite Television
10.7.2 Cable Television
10.8 Telecommunications
10.8.0 General
10.8.1 Telephone
10.8.2 Multimedia in Telecommunications
10.8.3 International Telecommunications Developments
11. OTHERS
11.0 General
11.1 Y2K Issues
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN LAW PRACTICE
1.0 General
Hugh Calkins, Gwendelyn A. Daniels & Richard Zorza, Can Technology Transform Legal Services from a 100-Pound Weakling into a Comprehensive and Integrated 3,000-Attorney Force for the Poor?, CLEARINGHOUSE REV. (2002).
Caroline Christiansen, Electronic Law Journals, 30 INT'L J. LEGAL INFO. 337 (2002).
Louise L. Hill, Symposium Online Activities & Their Impact on the Legal Profession: Electronic Communications and the 2002 Revisions of the Model Rules, 16 ST. JOHN'S J. LEGAL COMMENT. 529 (2002).
Mark Pruner, Symposium Online Activities & Their Impact on the Legal Profession: The Clash of 20th Century Regulation with 21st Century Technology, 16 ST. JOHN'S J. LEGAL COMMENT. 587 (2002).
Michelle L. Rice, International Business Law: E-Commerce and the Impact of Globalization on the Law: Panel Remarks: Basics of Starting a Virtual Law Practice, 8 NEW ENG. INT'L & COMP. L. ANN. 73 (2002).
Kevin Lee Thomason, The NETigator: The Netigator Answers Your Questions on Computers and Cyberspace, 28 SAN FRANCISCO ATT'Y 14 (2002).
Kevin Lee Thomason, The NETigator: Computers and Cyberspace Q & A, 28 SAN FRANCISCO ATT'Y 16 (2002).
Michael Whiteman, The Impact of the Internet and Other Electronic Sources on an Attorney's Duty of Competence Under the Rules of Professional Conduct, 51 DEF. L.J. 175 (2002).
1.1 Computerized Legal Research
1.1.0 General
Allan Hanson, From Key Numbers to Keywords: How Automation Has Transformed the Law, 94 LAW LIBR. J. 563 (2002).
1.1.1 Online Legal Research
Nicola Y. Whiteman & Michael C. Zisa, Researching Bankruptcy Law on the Internet, 22 CONSTR. LAW. 10 (2002).
Matt Wimberley, Transactions' Selection of Web Sites for Business Lawyers, 3 TRANSACTIONS 61 (2002).
1.1.2 Legal Research Using CD-ROM
1.2 Law Office Management
1.2.0 General
1.2.1 Office Automation
1.2.2 Case Management
1.2.3 Case File Security
John Christopher Anderson, Transmitting Legal Documents Over the Internet: How to Protect Your Client and Yourself, 51 DEF. L.J. 307 (2002).
1.2.4 Internet Access
1.3 Selected Uses in the Law Practice
1.3.0 General
Daniel Backer, Note, Choice of Law in Online Legal Ethics: Changing A Vague Standard for Attorney Advertising on the Internet, 70 FORDHAM L. REV. 2409 (2002).
Coleen M. Barger, Accessing the Law: On the Internet, Nobody Knows You're a Judge: Appellate Courts' Use of Internet Material, 4 J. APP. PROC. & PROCESS 417 (2002).
Louise L. Hill, Allen Chair Symposium 2001: Change is in the Air: Lawyer Advertising and the Internet, 36 U. RICH. L. REV. 341 (2002).
Catherine J. Lanctot, Symposium Online Activities & Their Impact on the Legal Profession: Regulating Legal Advice in Cyberspace, 16 ST. JOHN'S J. LEGAL COMMENT. 569 (2002).
1.3.1 Tax Filing
LaVerne Woods & Michele Osborne, Healthcare Organizations and the Internet: Impact on Federal Tax Exemption, 35 J. HEALTH L. 1 (2002).
Samuel Chan Yin-Sum & Simon Lueng Tak-Wing, Development of an Online Taxation Course: From Design to Evaluation, 28 INT'L TAX J. 23 (2002).
1.3.2 Bankruptcy
1.3.3 Estate Planning
Christopher J. Caldwell, Comment, Should "E-Wills" Be Wills: Will Advances in Technology Be Recognized for Will Execution?, 63 U. PITT. L. REV. 467 (2002).
Sam Stonefield, Electronic Real Estate Documents: Context, Unresolved Cost-Benefit Issues and a Recommended Decisional Process, 24 W. NEW ENG. L. REV. 205 (2002).
1.3.4 Real Estate
Dale A. Whitman, The Use and Recording of Electronic Real Estate Instruments: Are We There Yet? The Case For A Uniform Electronic Recording Act, 24 W. NEW ENG. L. REV. 245 (2002).
Derek Witte, Comment, Avoiding the Un-Real Estate Deal: Has the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act Gone Too Far?, 35 J. MARSHALL L. REV. 311 (2002).
2. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN LITIGATION
2.0 General
Douglas Adkins, The Supreme Court Announces a Fourth Amendment "General Public Use" Standard for Emerging Technologies but Fails to Define It: Kyllo v. United States, 27 DAYTON L. REV. 245 (2002).
Theodore F. Claypoole & Rebecca S. Kell, Coping with Electronic Data Discovery Issues, 14 ENVTL. CLAIMS J. 399 (2002).
Laura DiBiase & Jeanne Finegan, The Future of Electronic Legal Noticing, 2002 ABI JNL. LEXIS 39.
Symposium, Managing Caseflow in State Intermediate Appellate Courts, 35 IND. L. REV. 467 (2002).
David G. Post, Against "Against Cyberanarchy", 17 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1365 (2002).
Daniel I. Prywes, Discovery of Electronic Records: Preparing for the Inevitable, 31-SUM BRIEF 33 (2002).
Quin M. Sorenson, Losing a Plain View of Katz: The Loss of a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Under the Readily Available Standard, 107 DICK. L. REV. 179 (2002).
Gregory J. Wrenn, Cyberspace Is Real, National Borders Are Fiction: The Protection of Expressive Rights Online Through Recognition of National Borders in Cyberspace, 38 STAN. J. INT'L L. 97 (2002).
2.1 Scientific Evidence
2.1.0 General
Kenneth H. Ryesky, Accessing the Law: From Pens to Pixels: Text-Media Issues in Promulgating, Archiving, and Using Judicial Opinions, 4 J. APP. PROC. & PROCESS 353 (2002).
2.1.1 Expert Testimony
2.1.2 DNA Typing
Mary R. Anderlik & Mark A. Rothstein, The Genetics Revolution: Conflicts, Challenges and Conundra: DNA-Based Identity Testing and the Future of the Family: A Research Agenda, 28 AM. J.L. & MED. 215 (2002).
Meredith A. Bieber, Comment, Meeting the Statute or Beating it: Using "John Doe" Indictments Based on DNA to Meet the Statute of Limitations, 150 U. PENN. L. REV. 1079 (2002).
Diana L. Kanon, Note, Will the Truth Set Them Free? No, But the Lab Might: Statutory Responses to Advancements in DNA Technology, 44 ARIZ. L. REV. 467 (2002).
Seth F. Kreimer & David Rudovsky, Double Helix, Double Bind: Factual Innocence and Post-conviction DNA Testing, 151 U. PENN. L. REV. 547 (2002).
Anne-Marie Moyes, Note, Assessing the Risk of Executing the Innocent: A Case for Allowing Access to Physical Evidence for Posthumous DNA Testing, 55 VAND. L. REV. 953 (2002).
Heidi C. Schmitt, Post-Conviction Remedies Involving the Use of DNA Evidence to Exonerate Wrongfully Convicted Prisoners: Various Approaches Under Federal and State Law, 70 UMKC L. REV. 1001 (2002).
Ellen Yankiver Suni, Introduction to the Symposium on Wrongful Convictions: Issues of Science, Evidence, and Innocence, 70 UMKC L. REV. 797 (2002).
2.1.3 Fingerprint
2.1.4 Polygraph
2.1.5 Forensic Evidence
2.2 Demonstrative Evidence
2.2.0 General
Amber Harding, Tiffany Shatz & Brad Samuels, Procedural Issues, 39 AM. CRIM. L. REV. 923 (2002).
Mark R. Kravitz & Daniel J. Klau, Developments in the Second Circuit: 2000-2001, 34 CONN. L. REV. 833 (2002).
Andre A. Moenssens, Brain Fingerprinting--Can it be Used to Detect the Innocence of Persons Charged with a Crime?, 70 UMKC L. REV. 891 (2002).
Marcus C. Thomas, Workshops Bring It Industry and Law Enforcement Together, 36 PROSECUTOR 35 (2002).
2.2.1 Computer-Generated Evidence
Michael Marron, Note, Discoverability of "Deleted" E-Mail: Time For a Closer Examination, 25 SEATTLE U. L. REV. 895 (2002).
2.2.2 Audio/Visual Evidence
Richard D. Friedman, Remote Testimony, 35 U. MICH. J.L. REF. 695 (2002).
Lynn Helland, Remote Testimony--a Prosecutor's Perspective, 35 U. MICH. J.L. REF. 719 (2002).
Gregory P. Joseph, Internet and Email Evidence, 19 COMPUTER & INTERNET LAW. 17 (Apr. 2002).
Mary Lehman, Comment, Are Red Light Cameras Snapping Privacy Rights?, 33 U. TOL. L. REV. 815 (2002).
Richard D. Shoop, Constitutional Law: Bartnicki v. Vopper, 17 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 449 (2002).
Jill Witkowski, Comment, Can Juries Really Believe What They See? New Foundational Requirements for the Authentication of Digital Images, 10 WASH. U. J.L. & POL'Y 267 (2002).
2.3 Courtroom
Jonathan B. Ealy & Aaron M. Schutt, Comment, What--If Anything--Is An E-Mail? Applying Alaska's Civil Discovery Rules To E-Mail Production, 19 ALASKA L. REV. (2002).
Michael S. Elkin & Alexandra Khlyavich, Napster Near and Far: Will the Ninth Circuit's Ruling Affect Secondary Infringement in the Outer Reaches of Cyberspace, 27 BROOK. J. INT'L L. 381 (2002).
Susan Nauss Exon, The Internet Meets Obi-Wan Kenobi in the Court of Next Resort, 8 B.U. J. SCI & TECH. L. 1 (2002).
Margaret B. Flaherty, Note, How Courts Help You Help Yourself: The Internet and the Pro Se Litigant, 40 FAM. CT. REV. 91 (2002).
Michael E. Heintz, Note, The Digital Divide and Courtroom Technology: Can David Keep Up With Goliath?, 54 FED. COMM. L.J. 567 (2002).
LeRoy L. Kondo, Untangling the Tangled Web: Federal Court Reform Through Specialization for Internet Law and Other High Technology Cases, 2002 UCLA J. L. TECH. 1 (2002).
Sonal N. Mehta, Cyberlaw: Pavlovich v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County, 17 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 337 (2002).
Kathryn L. Ossian, U.S. Bancorp Obtains Transfer of Domain Names Through Dispute Resolution Procedure, 119 BANKING L.J. 828 (2002).
Jian Xiao, Intellectual Property: The First Wave of Cases Under the ACPA, 17 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 159 (2002).
2.4 Dispute Resolution
Benjamin G. Davis, et al., The First International Competition for Online Dispute Resolution: Is this Big, Different and New? 19 J. INT'L ARB. 379 (2002).
A. Michael Froomkin, ICANN'S Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy Causes and (Partial) Cures, 67 BROOK. L. REV. 605 (2002).
Cheri M. Ganeles, Comment, Cybermediation: A New Twist On An Old Concept, 12 ALB. L.J. SCI. & TECH. 715 (2002).
Orna Rabinovich-Einy, Going Public: Diminishing Privacy in Dispute Resolution in the Internet Age, 7 VA. J.L. & TECH. 4 (2002).
Elizabeth G. Thornburg, Fast, Cheap, and Out of Control: Lessons from the ICANN Dispute Resolution Process, 6 COMP. L. REV. & TECH. J. 89 (2002).
3. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN THE GOVERNMENT
3.0 General
Duncan Aldrich, John Carlo Bertot & Charles R. McClure, E-Government: Initiatives, Developments, and Issues, 19 GOV'T INF. Q. 349 (2002).
Stacy Blasberg, Legal Update: Law and Technology of Security Measures in the Wake of Terrorism, 8 B.U. J. SCI & TECH. L. 721 (2002).
Anthony N. Cabot & Robert D. Faiss, Symposium, Sports Gambling in the Cyberspace Era, 5 CHAP. L. REV. 1 (2002).
Brendan Durrett, Legal Reference Books Review: Privacy and the Digital State: Balancing Public Information and Personal Privacy, 94 LAW LIBR. J. 654 (2002).
Stephen Gidiere & Jason Forrester, Balancing Homeland Security and Freedom of Information, 16 NAT. RESOURCES & ENV'T 139 (2002).
Paul S. Herrnson, Part II: Electoral/Judicial Reform: Improving Election Technology and Administration: Toward a Larger Federal Role in Elections?, 37 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 147 (2002).
Paul T. Jaeger, Constitutional Principles and E-Government: An Opinion About Possible Effects of Federalism and the Separation of Powers on E-Government Policies, 19 GOV'T INF. Q. 357 (2002).
Robert A. Pikowsky, An Overview of the Law of Electronic Surveillance Post September 11, 2001, 94 LAW LIBR. J. 601 (2002).
Sharon H. Rackow, Comment, How the United States of America Patriot Act Will Permit Governmental Infringement Upon the Privacy of Americans, in the Name of "Intelligence" Investigations, 150 U. PENN. L. REV. 1651 (2002).
Harold C. Relyea, E-Government: Introduction and Overview, 19 GOV'T INF. Q. 9 (2002).
Michael P. Scharf & Melanie K. Corrin, International Business Law: E-commerce and the Impact of Globalization on the Law: Panel Remarks: On Dangerous Ground: Passive personality Jurisdiction and the Prohibition of Internet Gambling, 8 NEW ENG. INT'L & COMP. L. ANN. 19 (2002).
Paul M. Schwartz, Voting Technology and Democracy, 77 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 625 (2002).
Raymond Shih Ray Ku, Modern Statues in Privacy Law: Searching for the Meaning of the Fourth Amendment Privacy after Kyllo v. United States: The Founders' Privacy: The Fourth Amendment and the Power of Technological Surveillance, 86 MINN. L. REV. 1325 (2002).
Christopher Slobogin, Modern Statues in Privacy Law: Searching for the Meaning of the Fourth Amendment Privacy after Kyllo v. United States: Peeping Techno-Toms and the Fourth Amendment: Seeing Through Kyllo's Rules Governing Technological Surveillance, 86 MINN. L. REV. 1393(2002).
Daniel J. Solove, Modern Studies in Privacy Law: Notice, Autonomy and Enforcement of Data Privacy Legislation: Access and Aggregation: Public Records, Privacy and the Constitution, 86 MINN. L. REV. 1137 (2002).
Kieran Tranter, Terror in the Texts: Technology-Law-Future, 13 LAW & CRITIQUE 75 (2002).
Gina Tufaro, Note, Will Carnivore Devour the Fourth? An Exploration of the Constitutionality of the FBI Created Software, 18 N.Y.L. SCH. J. HUM. RTS. 305 (2002).
3.1 Computers and Technology in Law Enforcement
Sheryl Rakestraw, ACLU v. RENO, 217 F.3D 162 (3D CIR. 2000), 10 AM. U.J. GENDER SOC. POL'Y & L. 521 (2002).
3.1.0 General
Luke J. Albrecht, Comment, Constitutional Law--The Use of a Thermal Imaging Device Constitutes a Search Under the Forth Amendment--Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), 36 SUFFOLK U. L. REV. 249 (2002).
Susan Bandes, Modern Statues in Privacy Law: Searching for the Meaning of the Fourth Amendment Privacy after Kyllo v. United States: Power, Privacy and Thermal Imaging, 86 MINN. L. REV. 1379 (2002).
Christopher Benjamin, Shot Spotter and FaceIt: The Tools of Mass Monitoring, 2002 UCLA J. L. TECH. 2 (2002).
Susan W. Brenner & Barbara A. Frederiksen, Computer Searches and Seizures: Some Unresolved Issues, 8 MICH. TELECOMM. TECH. L. REV. 39 (2002).
Nathan E. Carrell, Spying on the Mob: United States v. Scarfo--A Constitutional Analysis, 2002 U. ILL. J.L. TECH. & POL'Y 193 (2002).
Jack H. Daniel III, Comment, Reform in Airport Security: Panic or Precaution?, 53 MERCER L. REV. 1623 (2002).
Deborah J. Daniels, Prosecution in the Post-9/11 Era, 36 PROSECUTOR 28 (2002).
Kimberly A. Horn, Note, Privacy versus Protection: Exploring the Boundaries of Electronic Surveillance in the Internet Age, 29 FORDHAM URB. L.J. 2233 (2002).
Mary Lehman, Comment, Are Red Light Cameras Snapping Privacy Rights, 33 U. TOL. L. REV. 815 (2002).
Amy Miller, Kyllo v. United States: New Law Enforcement Technologies and the Fourth Amendment, 51 KAN. L. REV. 181 (2002).
Rosemary Missisian, Note, The True Need of the Special Needs Doctrine: Individual Rights--Ferguson v. City of Charleston, 33 U. TOL. L. REV. 815 (2002).
Aaron Nance, Note, Taking the Fear Out of Electronic Surveillance in the New Age of Terror, 70 UMKC L. REV. 751 (2002).
Jessica M. Natale, Note, Exploring Virtual Legal Presence: The Present and the Promise, 1 J. HIGH TECH. L. 157 (2002).
Greg Star, Comment, Airport Security Technology: Is the use of Biometric Technology Valid Under the Fourth Amendment?, 20 TEMP. ENVTL. L. & TECH. J. 251 (2002).
Raya Tahan, Note, Should Criminal Case Filings Be Available Online?, 43 JURIMETRICS J. 43 (2002).
3.1.1 Computers and Technology in Police Operation
Catherine M. Barrett, Note, FBI Internet Surveillance: The Need for a Natural Rights Application of the Fourth Amendment to Insure Internet Privacy, 8 RICH. J.L. & TECH. 16 (2002), at http://www.law.richmond.edu/jolt/v8i3/article16.html.
Troy J. LeFevre, Search and Seizure: Supreme Court Addresses Advances in Technology and Rules that Thermal Imaging Devices May Not Be Used Without a Search Warrant, 78 N. DAK. L. REV. 99 (2002).
Gregory T. Neugebauer, Alcohol Ignition Interlocks: Magic Bullet or Poison Pill, 2 PGH. J. TECH. L. & POL'Y 2 (2002).
Geoffrey A. North, Note, Carnivore in Cyberspace: Extending the Electronic Communications Privacy Act's Framework to Carnivore Surveillance, 28 RUTGERS COMPUTER & TECH. L.J. 155 (2002).
Stacy E. Roberts, Note, Bond and Beyond: A Shift in the Understanding of What Constitutes a Fourth Amendment Search, 22 U. TOL. L. REV. 457 (2002).
Jennifer Hinson Shephard, Case Note, Kyllo v. United [States:.sup.1] The Fourth [Amendment.sup.2] and Thermal Imaging-Is It In or Out?, 19 T.M. COOLEY L. REV. 37 (2002).
Justin H. Smith, Note, Press One for Warrant: Reinventing the Fourth Amendment's Search Warrant Requirement Through Electronic Procedures, 55 VAND. L. REV. 1591 (2002).
Andrew W.J. Tarr, Picture It: Red Light Cameras Abide by the Law of the Land, 80 N.C. L. REV. 1879 (2002).
Sean D. Thueson, Comment, Fourth Amendment Search-Fuzzy Shades of Gray: The New "Bright-Line" Rule in Determining When The Use of Technology Constitutes a Search. Kyllo v. United States, 121 S. Ct. 2038 (2001), 2 WYO. L. REV. 169 (2002).
3.1.2 Computers and Technology in Correctional Institutions
3.2 Use of Computers and Technology by Federal Departments and Agencies
3.2.0 General
Michelle Armond, Cyberlaw: State Internet Regulation and the Dormant Commerce Clause, 17 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 379 (2002).
Alison A. Bradley, Extremism in the Defense of Liberty?: The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and the Significance of the USA PATRIOT ACT, 77 TUL. L. REV. 465 (2002).
Charles E. Frayer, Article: Employee Privacy and Internet Monitoring: Balancing Workers' Rights and Dignity with Legitimate Management Interests, 57 BUS. LAW. 857 (2002).
A. Michael Froomkin, Form & Substance in Cyberspace, 6 J. SMALL & EMERGING BUS. L. 93 (2002).
Neal Hartzog, Comment, The "Magic Lantern" Revealed: A Report of the FBI's New "Key Logging" Trojan and Analysis of its Possible Treatment in a Dynamic Legal Landscape, 20 J. MARSHALL J. COMPUTER & INFO. L. 287 (2002).
Kimberly A. Horn, Note, Privacy Versus Protection: Exploring the Boundaries of Electronic Surveillance in the Internet Age, 29 FORDHAM URB. L.J. 2233 (2002).
Giovanna Patterson & J. Tim Sprehe, Principal Challenges Facing Electronic Records Management in Federal Agencies Today, 19 GOV'T INF. Q. 307 (2002).
Joe Sims & Cynthia L. Bauerly, A Reply to Professor Froomkin's Form and Substance in Cyberspace, 6 J. SMALL & EMERGING BUS. L. 165 (2002).
Michael J. Wolf, Jon Numair & Jack Yoedt, Essential Collaborative Technology Tools for the 21st Century: FMCS TAGS System, 2 PEPP. DISP. RESOL. L.J. 327 (2002).
3.2.1 Military Technology
Robert A. Borich Jr., Globalization of the U.S. Defense Industrial Base: Developing Procurement Sources Abroad Through Exporting Advanced Military Technology, 31 PUB. CONT. L.J. 623 (2002).
Mitsuru Kurosawa, Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Export Control, 49 OSAKA. U. L. REV. 1 (2002).
Philip R. Principe, Secret Codes, Military Hospitals, and the Law of Armed Conflict: Could Military Medical Facilities' Use of Encrypted Communications Subject Them to Attack Under International Law?, 24 U. ARK. LITTLE ROCK L. REV. 727 (2002).
3.2.2 Internal Revenue Service
3.2.3 U.S. Patent Office
3.2.4 Government Information Retrieval System
3.3 Use of Computers and Technology in Judicial Administration
David D. Bird, Where to Go to Be in the Know: Court Web Sites, ABI JNL. LEXIS 76 (2002).
3.4 Use of Computers and Technology by State and Federal Legislatures
George Barnum, Availability, Access, Authenticity, and Persistence: Creating the Environment for Permanent Public Access to Electronic Government Information, 19 GOV'T INF. Q. 37 (2002).
4.LEGAL ISSUES OF COMPUTER AND TECHNOLOGY SALES, USAGE, AND SERVICES
4.0 General
Barbara H. Brandon & Robert D. Carlitz, Online Rulemaking and Other Tools For Strengthening Our Civil Infrastructure, 54 ADMIN. L. REV. 1421 (2002).
Stuart Buck, Replacing Spectrum Auctions with a Spectrum Commons, 2002 STAN. TECH. L. REV. 2 (2002).
Cyndie Chang, Comment, Exploring Internet Privacy Through Cable Broadband Struggles: ISPs Walk a Fine Line Between Privacy and Security, 22 LOY. L.A. ENT. L. REV. 491 (2002).
Arthur R. Gaudio, Electronic Real Estate Records: A Model for Action, 24 W. NEW ENG. L. REV. 271 (2002).
Gary Richard Hattal & Cynthia Morrow Hattal, Battling School Violence with Mediation...
NOTE: All illustrations and photos
have been removed from this article.
Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.
Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication
name or publication date.
About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company
analysis or best practices in managing your organization,
Goliath can help you meet your business needs.
Our extensive business information databases empower business
professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible,
authoritative information they need to support their business
goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting,
company research or defining management best practices -
Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.
|
.(bibliography)%20%20&position=1)