|
Article Excerpt That's No White Male, That's My Husband!
Ellen Ladowsky explains why women will deliver the death blow to affirmative action.
THE DIMINISHING RETURNS of affirmative action are particularly felt by young women entering the work force. By now the formal and informal barriers that once kept women out of many fields have come down. The white female college graduate is likely to face the same employment problems that have confronted her male classmates for the past decade: a limited number of slots, competition for promotions, and the denial of jobs because of "set-asides" for minority applicants.
Even in the instances when women are still hired to meet a quota, it is not always to redress perceived discrimination--quite the opposite. It can be a way of circumventing requirements for a minority candidate. A philosophy professor at a small, elite college told me that it is common practice for academic departments to hire women to meet affirmative action guidelines because, "We have trouble finding qualified minority candidates but it is easy to find a qualified woman."...
Woman's advancement in the workplace, then, seems indisputable. Yet should affirmative action get all the credit? Some researchers say no. "My own sense of the data," says Frederick R. Lynch, "is that primarily it's cultural change and enforcement of non-discrimination, not necessarily preferential treatment."
The final undoing of affirmative action in women's minds, however, may not stem from consideration of their own careers. Women know the men who have been victims of affirmative action's reverse discrimination or men who consider themselves to be victims. They are their husbands, brothers, or sons. Non-working women--or women temporarily out of the workforce to raise children--count on their husbands' salaries and promotions to support their families. "The angriest people [I interviewed] were the wives of men who had suffered reverse discrimination," says Lynch.
This "stand by your man" factor may turn out to be the force that causes female voters to reject affirmative action-first in California, and then across the nation.
~ Spring 1995
On the Backs of Women
Rael Jean Isaac shows how high-living union officials exploit women.
WHEN NEW YORK power broker Charles Hughes traveled abroad, he took along his nearest and dearest. His entourage for a jaunt to Egypt, Prague, London, and Paris numbered fourteen family members. Hughes also threw...
|
|

More articles from Women's Quarterly
The way we live now.(women's attitudes about clothes), March 22, 2003 Belles lettres., March 22, 2003 The war against boys.(collegiate women's sports), March 22, 2003 Feminist follies., March 22, 2003 Motherhood., March 22, 2003
Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.
Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication
name or publication date.
About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company
analysis or best practices in managing your organization,
Goliath can help you meet your business needs.
Our extensive business information databases empower business
professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible,
authoritative information they need to support their business
goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting,
company research or defining management best practices -
Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.
|
|