|
Article Excerpt Abstract
I discuss the overemphasis of "structure" in college freshman composition courses. By structure I not only mean the specific form of the writing itself, but also the specific requirements of the class.
In graduate school I taught two sections of freshman composition. One afternoon as I sat in my office working my way through a stack of students' papers, in walked a fellow grad student and teacher.
She sighed. "I can't keep track of everything in the classes I teach. I called one of my students to see why she's missed so much class, and she told me ..."
I said, "You called one of your students to talk about her attendance?"
"Well, she's missed so many days now, I wanted to discuss what she could do to make it up. Absences are really hurting her grade."
"Unbelievable," I said. I took attendance the first few classes so the office would know how many students were showing up. After that, I was doing great just keeping track of my students' names and grades.
My colleague was offended. "Well," she said, "how much do you deduct for skipping class? What's your attendance policy?"
Attendance policy? I didn't have one. The students paid for the class; I did my best to teach them to write well; we wrote; we discussed; we learned; we read; but I didn't take attendance for a grade. I understood my colleague's compassionate intent, but I wasn't going to track down every student who missed class.
Is it wrong to see a writing teacher as a product provider? The majority of students are not English majors. They're there because they have to be. Is it wrong for students to expect something practical and useful? Students should be taught how to write well--that's a practical skill. Often, we teachers pretend that the policies and procedures we establish directly relate to the course objectives. But in reality, many requirements in writing classes do little to produce a student who can write well.
Granted, some institutions require teachers to report attendance. This is not really the issue. The problem is if the teachers assign significant grade value to attendance. Certainly, a poor writer isn't going to get any better if she skips class, but the penalty should be and will be seen in her writing. Adding an additional, arbitrary penalty for missing class, causes resentment in students who, despite our opinion, feel that it's their penny spent, so attending class is their option. Also, significant, distinct penalties for absences seem to ignore the purpose of a composition course. It's a writing course, after all, not an attendance course. Demanding that students attend class in order to earn a good grade will...
|
|

More articles from Academic Exchange Quarterly
Mediated language classrooms: theory and practice., March 22, 2003 Course instructor as customer.(teaching information literacy ), March 22, 2003 Children's responses to coerced service-learners.(influence of mandato..., March 22, 2003 Pre-tertiary distributed education in Canadian urban centers.(possibil..., March 22, 2003 A writing center facilitates student writing across the curriculum., March 22, 2003
Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.
Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication
name or publication date.
About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company
analysis or best practices in managing your organization,
Goliath can help you meet your business needs.
Our extensive business information databases empower business
professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible,
authoritative information they need to support their business
goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting,
company research or defining management best practices -
Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.
|
|