Home | Industry Information | Business News | Browse by Publication | C | Community College Review

The location of developmental education in community colleges: a discussion of the merits of mainstreaming vs. centralization.

Publication: Community College Review
Publication Date: 22-JUN-02
Format: Online
Delivery: Immediate Online Access

Article Excerpt
This study compares mainstreaming and centralizaton, two ways in which community colleges organize developmental education. Based on previous literature, the two models are compared in terms of instructional quality, ancillary services, teacher characteristics, student reactions, and of for &...

View more below

You can view this article PLUS...

  • Hundreds of the most trusted magazines, newspapers, newswires, and journals (see list)
  • Business news from North America and around the World
  • More than 10 years of article archives
  • Unlimited Access at any time - ONLINE and all in ONE place

Now for a Limited Time, try Goliath Business News - Free for 7 Days!
Tell Me More   Terms and Conditions
Already a subscriber?
Log in to view full article
Purchase this article for $4.95

...reputation remediation. Pending empirical evidence the superiority of one model to another, recommendations are offered to college administrators and state policy makers for maximizing the effectiveness of each one.

**********

Ineffective high school education and increasing ethnic and linguistic diversity are combining to make developmental education critically important for individuals who wish to participate in postsecondary education. Developmental education has become an integral part of the community college mission (Carnevale Desrochers, 2001; Levin, 2001). With their open admissions policy and commitment to serving a wide range of students in local communities, community colleges have historically played an important role in higher education by offering instruction in basic reading, writing, and math skills to enable academically underprepared students to master the college curriculum. As Levin (2001) stated,

For many students in either large or small communities, the community college is the only public educational institution that will accept them for college-level studies given their high school academic performance. Furthermore, of the many types of postsecondary institutions facing students who are unprepared for college-level studies, the community college is the only institution whose legal and social mandate is remedial education. (p. xii)

Community college students display a number of academic and personal risk factors that are associated with low rates of persistence and achievement (McClenney, undated). In response, the colleges attempt to increase student preparedness for the college curriculum in a variety of ways including precollege level reading, writing, and math courses (variously termed "developmental education" and "remediation"); academic tutoring in learning assistance centers while students are enrolled in college-level courses; and instructional modifications such as writing-across-the-curriculum in discipline classrooms. Content-area remediation is also provided in some institutions in the form of supplemental instruction, a peer-tutoring model where students who have earned high grades in discipline courses (e.g. biology and history) lead study groups for students who are failing in those classes. However, among this complex array, developmental education courses are the most visible form of remediation in community colleges because these courses are clear catalog offerings in which basic skills instruction is formalized.

Organizational Approaches: Mainstreaming and Centralization

Given the importance of developmental education courses, the question has arisen as to whether they should be integrated into regular departments, here called mainstreaming, or housed in separate organizational units, referred to as centralization. The distinction between maistreaming and centralization is an important issue for college policy because the organization of developmental education may have direct impact on its quality (Boylan, Bliss, & Bonham, 1997). When developmental education is mainstreamed, precollege level remedial courses are offered in academic departments, such as English or mathematics, whose main purpose is to offer college-level courses applicable to associate's degrees or certificates. Courses are numbered as part of a sequence that begins with noncredit, remedial level instruction and continues through advanced associate-level preparation. Instructors are all considered faculty of the department in question and are paid through its budget. Working in close proximity in a departmental context permits developmental education instructors to mingle with colleagues who teach college-level courses. In fact, some faculty teach both developmental and credit-bearing courses simultaneously. On the other hand, when remediation is centralized, the remedial courses are offered in a separate department whose sole function is to offer precollege-level courses. Course numbers reflect the separateness of the department, and the faculty may communicate more often with each other than with instructors from academic departments. In addition to courses, the centralized department may offer ancillary support services such as counseling and tutoring. Most of the instructors will be paid from the centralized department's budget although some may have joint appointments with academic departments and teach courses in both (see McKay et al., 1998).

The term "mainstreaming" is used here in the context of stand-alone developmental education courses. The current question is whether such stand-alone courses should be offered in a regular college department or in a separate remedial department. Arendale (1998, cit. Damashek, 1999) uses the term to refer to the replacement of stand-alone courses with a comprehensive system of support available to all students via a learning assistance center. Boylan et al. (1997) use the term "decentralized" for what we are calling mainstreamed developmental education.

Although there have been strong statements in favor of centralization (e.g., Roueche & Roueche, 1999), there is little direct evidence to support this policy. The purpose of this article is to consider the relative merits of each approach. Because there is a shortage of empirical evidence in the previous literature, the discussion is speculative, relying on practitioners' views and relevant data reported in the existing literature. Sources of information for this discussion were journal articles, book chapters, and technical reports on community college developmental education identified in a search of the ERIC and Educational Abstracts electronic data bases, as well as bibliographies, conference presentations, and personal communications with experts...

NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.



More articles from Community College Review
Community college leadership preparation: needs, perceptions, and reco..., June 22, 2002
ERIC review: exploring the meaning of "nontraditional" at the communit..., June 22, 2002

Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.

Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication name or publication date.

About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company analysis or best practices in managing your organization, Goliath can help you meet your business needs.

Our extensive business information databases empower business professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible, authoritative information they need to support their business goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting, company research or defining management best practices - Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.