Home | Industry Information | Business News | Browse by Publication | S | SAM Advanced Management Journal

Management fads: here yesterday, gone today?

Publication: SAM Advanced Management Journal
Publication Date: 22-SEP-03
Format: Online - approximately 3964 words
Delivery: Immediate Online Access

Article Excerpt
In recent years, the academic interest in management fads can be illustrated by a growing body of literature from authors such as Abrahamson (1996, 1999) Carson et al (1999, 2000), Spell (1999), Ettorre (1997), Staw and Epstein (2000) and Gibson and Tesone (2001). Nor is this interest limited...

View more below

You can view this article PLUS...

  • Hundreds of the most trusted magazines, newspapers, newswires, and journals (see list)
  • Business news from North America and around the World
  • More than 10 years of article archives
  • Unlimited Access at any time - ONLINE and all in ONE place

Now for a Limited Time, try Goliath Business News - Free for 7 Days!
Tell Me More   Terms and Conditions
Already a subscriber?
Log in to view full article
Purchase this article for $4.95

...to academics. Popular press books on the subject include Sixty Trends in Sixty Minutes (2002), Management Fads and Buzzwords: Critical-Practical Perspectives (2000), Facing Up to Management Faddism: A New Look at an Old Force (2001), Managing Quality Fads: How American Business Learned to Play the Quality Game (1999), and the ever popular Dilbert entry, The Dilbert Principle: A Cubicle's Eye View of Bosses, Meetings, Management Fads & Other Workplace Afflictions. (1997).

In fact, it is hard to determine who is more interested in fads, the academics who write about them, the consultants who sell them, or the managers who use them. It is not even clear where fads originate. Does practice lead theory as some would suggest, or do academics and consultants originate the new management fads and urge them upon managers hoping to come up with a breakthrough in organizational productivity and effectiveness? In any event, managers are a willing group, always looking for something new and innovative. Abrahamson (1996) argues that norms of managerial rationality and progress dictate the enthusiasm with which management greets any new fad. Managerial rationality refers to society's expectations that managers will use the most efficient techniques, and managerial progress refers to society's expectations that managers will consistently seek and use "new and improved management techniques." (256)

Together, norms of managerial rationality and progress create the need for a flow of management techniques that organizational stakeholders believe are rational, at the forefront of management progress, and that managers can adopt in order to appear in conformity with these norms. (Abrahamson, 1996, 256)

But what constitutes a fad? The authors defined fads in a previous article as "widely accepted, innovative interventions into the organization's practices designed to improve some aspect of performance. Fads evolve into new management practices or are abandoned as failures." (Gibson and Tesone, 2001, 122) Say Miller and Hartwick (2002),

Though the term "fad" may seem dismissive, it's not. Fads like TQM can profoundly change companies, for better or for worse. And they can introduce useful ideas that companies incorporate into practice, even as the fad itself fades from the scene. But fads often fail to deliver on their promises, a factor that contributes to their short life cycles and rapid decline. (26)

This article introduces five management fads that were very popular in the second half of the 1900s, including: management by objectives (MBO), sensitivity training, quality circles, total quality management (TQM) and self-managed teams. The authors report findings from 178 respondents who were asked if they were familiar with these fads and considered them useful today. These results are one measure of the lasting significance of fads. Are they here yesterday but gone today? Before presenting the fads and the survey results, it may be useful to consider the common characteristics of management fads.

Common Characteristics of Management Fads

While individual fads vary considerably both in their approach and target (e.g., quality circles target quality improvement and team-building targets interpersonal relationships), ultimately all fads strive to improve organizational effectiveness. Several life-cycle theories have been postulated. The best known may be the one by Ettorre, who sees management fads going through five stages: discovery, wild acceptance, digestion, disillusionment, and hard core. (1997) Ettorre's model looks like a bell shaped curve with...

NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.



More articles from SAM Advanced Management Journal
Outsourcing information technology: assessing your options., September 22, 2003
Trust in the context of management relationships: an empirical study., September 22, 2003
An empirical investigation of CEO leadership in two types of small fir..., September 22, 2003
Leadership networking and active transitions in the workplace: freedom..., September 22, 2003
Bridge over troubled water: implementation of a program management off..., September 22, 2003

Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.

Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication name or publication date.

About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company analysis or best practices in managing your organization, Goliath can help you meet your business needs.

Our extensive business information databases empower business professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible, authoritative information they need to support their business goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting, company research or defining management best practices - Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.