|
Article Excerpt The proverbial zero-zero takeoff can be a perennial topic of debate whenever instrument pilots get together. Although you may have practiced them during your instrument training, chances are you've never attempted one since. Perhaps you've been presented with the need, but didn't want to tackle it in real conditions. Perhaps you've been lucky and the need never arose. If you had to execute a zero-zero takeoff, what is a good technique? How would you go about it? And what about the flight's necessity makes a zero-zero takeoff a good idea, regardless of how many you've flown? Of course, what exactly is a zero-zero takeoff, anyway? Why might we want to execute one?
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
In real-world conditions, a ceiling of zero feet rarely exists; for practical purposes, there's usually a little "air" between the surface and overlying clouds. That's one of the reasons the "ceiling obscured" terminology describing a low, indefinite ceiling on the old sequence reports was replaced with vertical visibility in the newer Metar format. Nil visibility is just as unlikely to occur. After all, when was the last time you really couldn't see the hand in front of your face? In fact, and even though it might be legal, we can't support attempting a takeoff in less than at least a few hundred feet of visibility. So, what we're really talking about here are low-visibility takeoffs.
There are three different phases to a very low visibility departure: First, you've got to get from wherever you've parked to the runway. Second, you've got to actually perform a takeoff without leaving the runway in any direction except up. And third, you've got to complete a climbout, smoothly making the transition from what visibility you have on the takeoff roll to flying solely on the instruments.
GETTIN' THERE
You've checked the weather. You've filed your flight plan. You've got current charts and even a current database in the GPS. You've reviewed the actual conditions (calm, 300 RVR, VV 100) and assessed the risk. Your plane is in very good condition with about 20 uneventful hours since that annual only two months ago. You're feeling good about your skills, having just aced your way through a full instrument refresher course at a major simulator training facility. You're as ready as...
|
|

More articles from Aviation Safety
Managing stability: most of the airplanes wetly are stable, well-balan..., October 01, 2009 EFIS evaluated: glass cockpits are standard these days, but what do pi..., October 01, 2009 Did the FAA get this one right? An online discussion between helicopte..., October 01, 2009 Flight following: it's neither IFR, nor VFR. Getting it, keeping it an..., October 01, 2009 Dark horizon: night VFR over a remote area can mean little or no natur..., October 01, 2009
Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.
Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication
name or publication date.
About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company
analysis or best practices in managing your organization,
Goliath can help you meet your business needs.
Our extensive business information databases empower business
professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible,
authoritative information they need to support their business
goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting,
company research or defining management best practices -
Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.
|
|