Home | Business News | Browse by Publication | T | The American (Washington, DC)

Beat the cheats: college faculty now use technology to combat cheating on campus. Charles Euchner on the digital efforts to restore academic integrity and honor.

Article Excerpt
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Late last year, a student at the American University of Paris sent a request to a company called Writerboard. "I have another paper to write," he wrote in an email. "It's another art history paper. It should be around 3-5 pages. It is the same course than [sic] the last two. It should therefore be written with the same approach." He added: "I have attached the professor's guideline as well as the other two essays you have written for me."

The papers Justin (not his real name) attached use dramatically different styles. The first, speaking of a Paul Cezanne critic, states: "While his artistic critical eye seems accurate if not always reliable, the pagan frisson of his Freudian approach is perhaps overly compelling for him." (The term "pagan frisson" later provoked gallows laughter among art history faculty at the university.) The second paper used a simpler style: "The buildings are cast in various shades of dour gray, structures that rise over 50 feet above the street."

For his new assignment, Justin asked Writerboard to produce an analysis of a single work of art from two different critical perspectives. Not long after Justin placed his order for a new paper, Professor Anna Russakoff obtained emails that documented her student's cheating.

Preparing to confront the student, Russakoff asked her department chair and dean for advice. Before Russakoff could confront him, Justin sought help for yet another assignment, this time an analysis of art at the Louvre. After being informed of Justin's new request for an outside writer--his fourth documented case of at least attempting to cheat--Russakoff lamented in an email: "And wouldn't you think that if you came to Paris to study art history you might actually WANT to go to the Louvre to look at art...????"

In the following weeks, Russakoff got mixed signals from the university's administrators. Her department chair agreed that the evidence of cheating was strong, but the dean would not go so far.

When Russakoff confronted the student, he denied any cheating. When he could not define words in the paper such as "eschew" and "obtuse," he explained that his sister helped him edit the paper. At the suggestion of the dean, the student supplied what he claimed were printouts of emails with his sister. Russakoff is sure Justin produced the materials after the fact, since she possesses...

View this article FREE - Now for a Limited Time, try Goliath Business News
Free for 3 Days!