|
Article Excerpt Teaching integration involves engaging students as active participants in the unfolding relationship of psychology and Christianity, with a particular focus on integration. Ten specific teaching strategies are offered to help students enter into the challenges and opportunities of integration. The teaching strategies are organized according to Moon's (1997) four directions for integration: practical, personal, classic, and contemporary.
**********
When Bain (2004) reported the results of a 15-year study on what the best college teachers do in the classroom, he emphasized the importance of lively engagement, where students are ushered into the drama and mystery of a particular discipline. Bain writes:
The best teachers often try to create what we have come to call " a natural critical learning environment." In that environment, people learn by confronting intriguing, beautiful, or important problems, authentic tasks that will challenge them to grapple with ideas, rethink their assumptions, and examine their mental models of reality. (p. 18)
Though Bain's research pertained to a variety of disciplines and worldviews his notion of crafting a "natural critical learning environment" seems particularly fitting for those attempting to teach the relationship of psychology and Christianity.
There are various views regarding the proper relationship between psychology and Christian theology (Johnson & Jones, 2000), ranging from those who perceive that the two disciplines should be relatively independent to those who believe one should be mostly quieted by the other. In this article-crafted by two professors and a graduate student each with a variety of experiences and perspectives on integration-we begin with the assumption that a mutually transformative integration is a worthy endeavor. That is, our faith ought to be influenced by what we discover in psychology, and our psychology ought to be influenced by what we discover in Christian theology. We explore possibilities for creating a learning environment where students enter into the realm of integration as active participants more than passive learners. We do this by revisiting the 4 directions for integration offered by Moon (1997): practical integration, personal integration, classic integration, and contemporary integration. In each case, we offer teaching strategies designed to engage students in the integrative process.
PRACTICAL INTEGRATION
Today's integration is strongly influenced by the growth of clinical psychology doctoral programs housed in Christian institutions. Not surprisingly, integrative conversation. For example, "Should I pray with clients?" "What sort of integrative work is possible if the client and therapist do not share a Christian faith commitment?" "Is forgiveness a reasonable goal for Christian survivors of sexual abuse?" Students often enter graduate training with the expectation that their professors will offer dear and compelling answers to these questions and more, and then feel disappointed-even disenchanted-when they discover wide-ranging opinions on issues of practical integration. Offering students access to this range of opinions is an important goal for teaching practical integration.
Teaching Strategy: Talking to the Integrators (McMinn)
Once students work through the disappointment or realizing there is not a single textbook on how to do practical integration, they are often eager to understand the variety of perspectives that Christina psychologists hold. One way to do this is to assign a textbook that offers multiple perspectives on the relationship of psychology and Christianity, such as Psychology & Christianity: Four Views (Johnson & Jones, 2000). Another way is to assign more than one book-each offering a different perspective on how psychology and faith are related. At this point the professor faces a challenge of self-disclosure. Should the professor simply present the various perspectives for how psychology and Christianity can be related, or should the professor advocate for a particular perspective? We (McMinn and Moon) have tended to advocate for an integrative view while still pointing out the virtues of competing perspectives, such as biblical counseling, Christian psychology, and levels of explanation. Others may find it more useful to take a neutral position and let students discern the view that best fits with their understanding of faith and psychology.
Beyond assigning the books, consider a conversation with the authors of the chapters or books that are assigned. Authors are often willing to schedule a brief telephone or Skype appointment with the class. This provides students an opportunity to ask questions that arise during their reading, and also to put a voice (and perhaps a face) to the words they have read. Even if the books assigned to do not directly address the most practical integration questions (e.g., "When should I pray with a client?"), conversations with authors often veer toward practical considerations because these are the questions students are inclined to ask.
Teaching Strategy 2: Systematic Evaluation of an Integration Model (Moon)
As part of appreciating the variety of perspectives it can be helpful for students to read broadly across the landscape of relating psychology and faith before doing a more in depth evaluation of a particular model. To accomplish the first goal, as part of our foundational integration course, students read one book for historical perspective: The Integration of Psychology and Theology (Carter & Narramore, 1970); and one book for a more contemporary overview: Psychology & Christianity: Four Views (Johnson & Jones, 2000). Then to provide the context for how relating faith and practice for mental health professionals differs from what occurs in the traditions of pastoral counseling and spiritual direction the text Spiritual Direction and the Care of Souls: A Guide to Christian Approaches and Practices (Moon & Benner, 2004) is assigned. With that foundation, the students move on to the examination of practical considerations presented in Psychology, Theology, and Spirituality in Christian Counseling (McMinn, 1996). And I'm...
|
|

More articles from Journal of Psychology and Theology
Teaching integration outside the traditional classroom.(Report), March 22, 2009 Developing integration skills: the role of clinical supervision.(Repor..., March 22, 2009 Faith-praxis integration in research design and statistics.(Report), March 22, 2009 The Spiritual Brain.(The Spiritual Brain: A Neuroscientist's Case for ..., March 22, 2009
Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.
Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication
name or publication date.
About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company
analysis or best practices in managing your organization,
Goliath can help you meet your business needs.
Our extensive business information databases empower business
professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible,
authoritative information they need to support their business
goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting,
company research or defining management best practices -
Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.
|
|