Home | Business News | Browse by Publication | D | Daedalus

Will ignorance & partisan election of judges undermine public trust in the judiciary?

Article Excerpt
The complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential in a limited Constitution. By a limited Constitution, I understand one which contains certain specified exceptions to the legislative authority; such, for instance, as that it shall pass no bills of attainder, no ex post facto laws, and the like. Limitations of this kind can be preserved in practice no other way than through the medium of courts of justice, whose duty it must be to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution void. Without this, all the reservations of particular rights or privileges would amount to nothing.

--Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist No. 78

The judicial branch enjoys higher levels of public trust than the other branches of the U.S. government."[The Supreme Court is an especially well regarded institution, and over and over again, polls show that Americans have more confidence in the Court than either the president or the Congress, "write political scientists Gregory A. Caldeira and Kevin T. Mc Guire. "In evaluating the Court's authority, most Americans think that it is exercising about the right amount of political power, and more often than not they believe that the Court is doing a good job." (1) Consistent with this notion, an August 2007 survey by the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania (2) found that 66 percent of Americans trust the Supreme Court a "great deal" or "fair amount" to operate in the best interests of the American people. Sixty percent of Americans trust the courts in their own state a "great deal" or "fair amount," while only 41 percent of Americans polled trust the president a "great deal" or "fair amount" to operate in the best interests of the American people--the same level of confidence that Americans have in Congress (41 percent).

However, lurking in the data from the same survey are two factors with the capacity to undermine confidence in the judiciary and, with it, public willingness to protect the prerogatives of judges and the courts. Ignorance about the role and function of judges and the courts and partisan campaigning for judicial office each independently threaten public trust in the judiciary. As trust declines, willingness to constrain the judiciary rises.

A first predictor of diminished trust in courts...

View this article FREE - Now for a Limited Time, try Goliath Business News
Free for 3 Days!