Home | Business News | Browse by Publication | F | Foreign Policy in Focus

Iraq and the transatlantic alliance.

Publication: Foreign Policy in Focus
Publication Date: 21-MAR-07
Format: Online
Delivery: Immediate Online Access

Article Excerpt
The Iraq War tore at the already frayed fabric of transatlantic security relations. Although European countries declared their solidarity with the United States after September 11, they were increasingly uncomfortable with Washington's emphasis on unilateralist approaches to global problems. After President Bush took office in 2001, his administration upset many European leaders by refusing to sign the Kyoto Protocol on global warming, opposing the International Criminal Court, and killing the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. In October 2001, Washington was reluctant at first to use the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in the campaign to oust the Taliban in Afghanistan. While taken aback by U.S. reluctance, NATO leaders and Europeans generally approved of the U.S.-led operation.

This was not true of the 2003 Iraq invasion, which widened the fissures between the United States and Europe as well as within Europe itself. Indeed, the invasion of Iraq led to one of the most damaging diplomatic rows in transatlantic relations since the end of World War II. Since the invasion, the Iraq War has continued to erode trust and military resources. With the recent British decision to withdraw a substantial number of troops from Iraq, the coalition of the willing is now on its last legs. The only glimmer of hope lies with recent poll data that reveal that Europeans and Americans share similar views of global security threats.

The Invasion of Iraq

With Americans feeling more vulnerable after the September 11 terrorist attacks and Europe willing to help, the Bush administration started to ramp up efforts within the United Nations to give Iraq an ultimatum on weapons inspections. In November 2002, all 15 members of the UN Security Council agreed on Resolution 1441. The resolution stated that unless Iraq allowed the free movement of weapons inspectors and gave up any weapons of mass destruction (WMD) it would face "serious consequences." NATO formally announced its support for the resolution that same month at the Prague Summit.

To...

Read the FULL article now - Try Goliath Business News - FREE!   
You can view this article PLUS...

  • Over 5 million business articles
  • Hundreds of the most trusted magazines, newswires, and journals (see list)
  • Premium business information that is timely and relevant
  • Unlimited Access

Now for a Limited Time, try Goliath Business News - Free for 3 Days!
Tell Me More   Terms and Conditions

Get Goliath Business News for 1 year - Just $99 (Save 65%)
Tell Me More   Terms and Conditions

Already a subscriber? Log in to view full article



More articles from Foreign Policy in Focus
Engaging Pyongyang on human rights., November 20, 2008
Revisiting intelligence reform., December 06, 2007
The U.S., India and the elusive 123 deal., September 07, 2007
Article 9's global impact.(Essay), July 26, 2007
The end of supreme command., June 22, 2007

Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.

Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication name or publication date.

About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company analysis or best practices in managing your organization, Goliath can help you meet your business needs.

Our extensive business information databases empower business professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible, authoritative information they need to support their business goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting, company research or defining management best practices - Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.