|
Article Excerpt As graduate students at MIT, Dean Karlan and John Romalis didn't just feast on food for thought, which is why, as they completed their studies in economics, they found themselves getting fat.
These pudgy scholars knew a little something about incentives, so they made a deal: each would have to lose 38 pounds in six months or forfeit half his annual income to the other. If both failed, the one who lost less would pay the other a quarter of his income. For a while nothing much happened, so they just extended the deadline--until they realized they were getting nowhere, and agreed to a clause making any further renegotiation attempts the basis of immediate forfeiture.
The new agreement worked. By 2002 both men had lost the weight, and as long as the stakes remained serious and nonnegotiable, they mostly kept it off. At one point, Karlan even collected $15,000 from his friend, whose weight had popped back up over the limit; Karlan says he had to take the money to maintain the credibility of their system.
Karlan has moved on to Yale and Romalis is at the University of Chicago, but both still struggle with their weight. Romalis reports that after ending his agreement with Karlan he has piled on the pounds. Karlan too gained weight in the absence of a possible financial loss, until he established a similar contract with his friend Ian Ayres, a Yale law professor. He's also made a contract to exercise regularly. His weight remains under control.
Why must these disciplined intellectuals subject themselves to a Damoclean legal agreement just to control their eating? As Karlan explains it, the contracts work by counteracting the natural human tendency to prize short-term rewards--the taste of pistachio Haagen-Dazs right now--over such longer-term goals as a healthy body weight and reasonable cholesterol level. We can all make rules for ourselves; Karlan's weight-loss contracts raise the cost of breaking them. Could he have lost the weight without a contract? Over a nice healthy salad in New Haven one sunny afternoon, he answers without hesitation: "No."
While this may sound like an arrangement only an economist could love, most of us have taken steps, at one time or another, to limit our future choices in order to guard against weakness or change of heart...
|
|

More articles from The American (Washington, DC)
Why you hate to fly: thirty years ago this October, the era of afforda..., September 01, 2008 Closing Iran's oil spigot: Robert Haddick explains why there is one la..., September 01, 2008 When an epoch began: in a single year the frontier closed, a course to..., September 01, 2008 The architect who meant business: Eero Saarinen and the aspirations of..., September 01, 2008
Looking for additional articles?
Search our database of over 3 million articles.
Looking for more in-depth information on this industry?
Search our complete database of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication
name or publication date.
About Goliath
Whether you're looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company
analysis or best practices in managing your organization,
Goliath can help you meet your business needs.
Our extensive business information databases empower business
professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible,
authoritative information they need to support their business
goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting,
company research or defining management best practices -
Goliath is your leading source for accurate information.
|
|